Developing a Strategic Plan for Locating Underground Dams in Khorramabad County

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Watershed Management Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran.

2 Department of Forest Science and Engineering, Faculty of of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

3 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran

10.22126/ges.2024.11211.2791

Abstract

Underground dams, as one of the water flow control and storage structures along seasonal waterways, can be the most effective way to solve water-related issues. In the current research, using the integrated QSPM-SWOT model, suitable places for the development of underground dams in Khorramabad County were examined. First, to provide the required information, the study area was visited and a questionnaire was prepared to prepare the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) in the construction of underground dams. This questionnaire was completed by 25 water resource management experts and residents of the study area. Then, using the SWOT model and QSPM matrix, a thorough analysis and convenient problem-solving method were selected to locate underground dams. The results showed that among the internal factors, vulnerability and pollution are less due to human and environmental factors (0.458) and extraction of high-quality water (0.372), and among external factors, restoration, stabilization, and increase of vegetation (0.304) and damage to underground water tables in case of construction without conducting sufficient studies (0.276), have been most effective in choosing strategies. Based on the obtained results, the use of a defensive strategy for the management of underground water resources, which is done by covering the weaknesses, overcoming the threats, and taking advantage of the strengths and the opportunities to locate the underground dams suitably, has a higher priority than other strategies (competitive-aggressive, diversity, and revision) in the study area. In addition, solutions were presented along the supply measures and then for the spatial prioritization of underground dams using the QSPM quantitative matrix. Finally, the solution to increasing the level of regional water flow by selecting educated managers in the field of underground dams water before and after construction was given priority with a final score of 6.074.
 
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
Underground dams can store and make available underground water resources. Furthermore, considering the complexity of decision-making in water resources issues with the presence of various internal and external factors, there is a need to use a new strategic planning framework with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to develop sustainable water resources management strategies. In this regard, the model of SWOT analysis in several studies on the evaluation and location of underground dams in the country and abroad has been used. In this study, the construction of underground dams in Khorramabad county in Lorestan province, western Iran, has been determined as a goal using decision-making criteria and geographic information systems. By considering environmental, economic, and social factors, the effective factors in assessing the location of underground dams have been defined. In this research, a strategic method for the development of underground dams has been presented by using the FAHP multi-criteria decision-making model, SWOT analytical model, and quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPM) model. The findings are a useful approach in selecting and prioritizing optimal locations for the construction of underground dams, especially in arid and semi-arid regions.
 
2-Materials and Methods
The study area is Khorramabad county (4942 km2) in Lorestan province, western Iran. The statistical sample determined in this research was 25 people, among whom 10 people were experts and specialists familiar with the study field and 15 people were selected from residents. Data analysis was done through factor analysis using SPSS software. The Likert scale was used to identify and confirm the factors (internal and external) affecting the study area. Then, the SWOT strategic analysis method was used. After selecting the sample in this research, the evaluation matrix of internal and external factors was formed. In this research, 14 strengths and 9 weaknesses for internal factors and 13 opportunities and 10 threats for external factors were prepared based on experts' opinions. Using experts' opinions, coefficients were determined for the selected factors decisions were made about strategic factors, and the results obtained from the matrices were used to determine the final value. Using FAHP and preparing questionnaires for each of the indicators, the values and strategies (competitive-aggressive, diversity, revision, and defensive strategies) were determined to create underground dams. Based on the SWOT model, we determined the strategic plan of the area using the information from the previous stage, and a total of 8 strategies were extracted, which were prioritized using the QSPM matrix. The implementation phases of the quantitative matrix are as follows: external and internal factors are listed in the rows, and strategies are defined in the columns. To establish a relationship between the defined strategies and the indicators of external and internal factors, two columns were given in the name of the relative attractiveness of each index and the existing strategic attractiveness score and its relative score based on the relationship between 1 and 4. Finally, according to the weights determined for internal and external factors through the FAHP model obtaining the relative importance coefficient of each variable and multiplying it by the partial attractiveness coefficient of each variable, the strategic attractiveness score was extracted.
 
3- Results and Discussion
The findings showed that among the determined strengths, the index of vulnerability and less pollution by human and environmental factors (0.458) is the most important. Furthermore, the water resource management index of springs and canals of each district (0.0075) is one of the least important indicators of strengths. Among the weaknesses (Table 1), the limited areas suitable for the construction of underground dams due to the need for a slope of less than 5% (0.132) is known as the most effective indicator. On the other hand, the lack of visibility of work, monitoring of executive actions, watertight walls, and water control is difficult and requires many studies (0.04) was recognized as the least effective index.  For external factors, 13 opportunities and 10 threats are presented (Table 2). The results showed that the restoration, stabilization, and increase of vegetation index (0.304) is the most effective index from the experts' point of view. In addition, among the selected opportunities, the promotion of inter-organizational cooperation was found as the least valuable index (0.07). Among the threats, the indicator of damage to underground water tables in case of construction without conducting sufficient studies (0.276) is the most important indicator and the liquidation of downstream water rights (0.045) is the least important. Figure 3 indicates cost leadership or contracting, i.e. defensive strategy, underground dams can develop in this area, and the organization should seek to prevent external threats, as well as, eliminate all its weaknesses. Therefore, it is necessary to overcome the existing threats and weaknesses by taking advantage of the strengths and opportunities of underground dams. Table 4 indicates the placement of the strategy of increasing the level of regional water flow by choosing educated managers in the field of water (strategy six) and balancing the water resources coming out of the basin by constructing modern storage structures (strategy four) in the first and second priorities of implementation in the study area.
 
4- Conclusion
In this study, the SWOT analytical model and QSPM quantitative matrix were used to establish underground dams, and the results indicated the priority of a defensive strategy. Also, the sixth strategy (increasing the level of regional water flow by choosing educated managers in the field of water) was given the highest priority. Therefore, to establish underground dams in the target area and similar areas, before and after the construction of underground dams, the assessment of the increase in the level of regional water flow should be done by choosing educated managers in the field of water. Considering the frequent occurrence of dry periods and their environmental, economic, and social consequences in the study area, it is necessary to improve and apply sustainable water management methods.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abtahi, S.E., Kardoost, A., Asghar, A., & Sedaghat Shaygan, D. (2013). Presenting a model for assessing and managing risk in water and wastewater infrastructures with a passive defense approach (case study: Border province). Water and Sustainable Development, 10(4), 59-70. doi: 10.22067/jwsd.v10i4.2307-1255. (In Persian).
Afkhami, H. (2018). Providing an appropriate management strategy using the integrated QSPM-SWOT model with the aim of organizing nomads (Case study: Goud Arab Taheri nomadic tribe of Tabas). Watershed Development and Promotion. 6(23);40-49. https://www.wmji.ir/ article254770.html. (In Persian).
Afsari, A.H., Haji Naseri, S., Fazeli, M., & Fairhi, D. (2017). A data-based model for sociological investigation of water governance in the Lake Urmia crisis. Strategic Studies in Public Policy, 7(25), 53-72. https://www.sid.ir/paper/229923/fa. (In Persian).
Asadi, A., & Kazerouni, H. (2019). A review of methods for constructing underground dams as a watershed development plan. Watershed Development and Promotion, 8(30), 35-43. https://www.wmji.ir/article_254387_142608333a21e1bfdf9f94634fd8c13e.pdf. (In Persian).
Bayati Khatibi, M., & Sari Saraf, B. (2014). Identification of wind erosion risk areas in the southeast of Lake Urmia, case study: Bonab and Malekan counties. Hydrogeomorphology, 11(39), 119-140. doi: 10.22034/hyd.2024.60434.1728. (In Persian).
Beiranvandi, V. (2012). Needs assessment and location of suitable areas for underground dam construction. Publications of the Arshadhan Educational Institute, 94. https://www.gisoom. com/book/11661570. (In Persian).
Boretti, A., & Rosa, L. (2019). Reassessing the projections of the World Water Development Report. npj Clean Water, 2, 15. doi: 10.1038/s41545-019-0039-9
Chazgi, J., Maleknejad, H., Haqqas, M.R., & Nakhaei, M. (2018). Providing a comprehensive and appropriate strategy for the development of underground dam construction using the SWOT model and the quantitative QSPM matrix (case study: Kiryan Basin). Soil and Water Sciences, 22(1), 187-198. dor: 20.1001.1.24763594.1397.22.1.18.7. (In Persian).
Darfashan, F., Heydarnejad, M., Bordbar, A., Daneshian, H. (2017). Locating suitable sites for constructing underground dams using the AHP multi-criteria decision-making method. Water Engineering. 2(4); 9-20. https://journals.iau.ir/article_531713.html. (In Persian).
EsmaaliOuri, A., Golshan, M., & Khorami, K. (2016). Prioritizing suitable axes for constructing an underground dam in the Dost-Biglo watershed. Physical Geography Research, 48(4), 645-659. doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2016.60834. (In Persian).
Forzieri, G., Gardenti, M., Caparrini, F., & Castelli, F. (2008). A methodology for the preselection of suitable sites for surface and underground small dams in arid areas: A case study in the region of Kidal, Mali. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 33(1–2), 74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2007.04.014
Ishida, S., Tsuchihara T., Yoshimoto S., & Imaizumil M (2011). Review Sustainable Use of Groundwater with Underground Dams. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ, 45, 51-61. doi: 10.6090/jarq.45.51
Jahani Shakib, F., Malek Mohammadi, B., Yousefi Rubiat, E., & Alipour, M. (2017). Developing management strategies using a new method for assessing the vulnerability of wetland ecosystems. Environmental Science and Technology, 19(32), 377-391. doi: 10.22034/jest. 2017.11339. (In Persian).
Jamali, I.A., Olofsson, B., & Mörtberg, U. (2013). Locating suitable sites for the construction of subsurface dams using GIS. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70(6), 2511-2525. doi: 10.1007/ s12665-013-2295-1
Kharazi, P., Yazdani, M.R., & Khazealpour, P (2019). Suitable identification of underground dam locations, using decision-making methods in a semi-arid region of Iranian Semnan Plain. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 9, 100240. doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100240
Kharrazi, P., Yazdani, M.R., Ara, H., & Khazaelpour, P. (2017). Location of underground dam using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in the Desert Plain Watershed, Geographic Information Sepehr, 26(103), 177-185. dor: 20.1001.1.25883860.1396.26.103.14.5. (In Persian).
Kordi, R., Faramarzi, M., Karimi, H., Gerai, P., & Yarmohammadi, E. (2016). Locating underground dams in arid and semi-arid regions of western Iran (Case study: Mehran, Ilam province). Watershed Management, 7 (13), 164-172. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.jwmr.7.13.172. (In Persian).
Kumar, S. (2024). Design of Rain Water Harvesting System for Efficient Water Scarcity and Flood Management in India. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14 (6), 295-303. doi: 10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i64229
Maleki, M., Tavakoli, S., S.M., & Javan, F. (2018). Analysis of the effects of dam construction on the vegetation of the surrounding areas at different altitudes and slopes. Case study: Soleiman Shah and Gavshan dams. Spatial Research. 2(2), 102-117. https://sid.ir/paper/270593/fa. (In Persian).
Masoumi, M., Vaeli, A., Karimi, G.H., Boalhassani, K., Kalani, A., & Ansari, H. (2012). Modeling water resources and uses of watersheds through the implementation of data governance in the Water and Energy Observatory. Water and Sustainable Development. 9(4), 123-130. https://jwsd.um.ac.ir/article_43679.html. (In Persian).
Mehrnehad, H., & Bordara, H. (2016). Study of environmental risks of pollutants in Mehriz region in causing pollution on groundwater resources of Yazd aquifer. Geology and Engineering. 9(2-1), 45-57. https://www.sid.ir/paper/512319/fa. (In Persian).
Mirzaei, S., & Mostafazadeh, R. (2018). Change in the response of the hydrograph of a watershed unit due to the construction of short delay structures. Iranian Irrigation and Water Engineering. 9(2), 37-49. doi: 10.22125/iwe.2019.87265. (In Persian).
Musie, W., & Gonfa, G. (2023). Fresh water resource, scarcity, water salinity challenges and possible remedies: A review. Heliyon, 9 (8), e18685. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18685
Panhwar, A., Abro, R., Kandhro, A., Khaskheli, A.R., Jalbani, N., Gishkori, K.A., Mahar, A.M., & Qaisar, S. (2022). Global Water Mapping, Requirements, and Concerns over Water Quality Shortages. Water Quality - New Perspectives. IntechOpen, 108331. doi: 10.5772/intechopen. 108331
Radmehr, A., Bozorg-Haddad, O. & Loáiciga, H.A. (2022). Integrated strategic planning and multi-criteria decision-making framework with its application to agricultural water management. Scientific Reports, 12, 8406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12194-5
Sadeghiravesh, M. H., Khosravi, H., & Abolhasani, A. (2023). Selecting proper sites for underground dam construction using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory in arid and semi-arid regions. Journal of Mountain Science, 20(1), 197-208.‏ doi: 10.1007/s11629-021-7262-9
Safdari, Z., Nahavandchi, H., & Joodaki, G. (2022). Estimation of Groundwater Depletion in Iran’s Catchments Using Well Data. Water, 14, 131. doi: 10.3390/w14010131
Sahadevan, D.K., & Pandey, A.K. (2023). Groundwater over-exploitation driven ground subsidence in the himalayan piedmont zone: Implication for aquifer health due to urbanization. Journal of Hydrology, 617 (C), 129085. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129085
Shirin Hesar, R., & Ghawati, A (2013). Comprehensive water resources management for a sustainable future using the SWOT model (Case study: North Khorasan Regional Water Company). Water and Sustainable Development. 10(4), 15-28. doi: 10.22067/jwsd.v10i4. 2307-1256. (In Persian).
Talebi, A., & Zahedi, E. (2015). Determining areas susceptible to underground dam construction using fuzzy logic theory and hierarchical analysis (Study area: Darongar Dargaz watershed). Iranian Watershed Science and Engineering. 9(30), 41-50. http://jwmsei.ir/article-1-541-fa.html. (In Persian).
Wada, Y., Flörke, M., Hanasaki, N., Eisner, S., Fischer, G., Tramberend, S., Satoh, Y., van Vliet, M.T.H., Yillia, P., Ringler, C., Burek, P., & Wiberg, D. (2016). Modeling global water use for the 21st century: the Water Futures and Solutions (WFaS) initiative and its approaches. Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 175–222. doi: 10.5194/gmd-9-175-2016
Woldearegay, K., Grum, B., Hessel, R., van Steenbergen, F., Fleskens, L., Yazew, E., Tamene, L., Mekonnen, K., Reda, T., & Haftu, M. (2024). Watershed management, groundwater recharge and drought resilience: An integrated approach to adapt to rainfall variability in northern Ethiopia. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 12(3), 663-683. doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.08.009
Yarahmadi, D., & Beiranvand, H (2014). Physical Geography of Lorestan. Lorestan University Publications, 247. https://climatology.ir/wp-content/uploads/2019/04.pdf. (In Persian).
Yousefi, M., Farrokhzadeh, B., & Basati, S. (2017). Prioritizing areas for underground dam construction using the geometric mean method in a geographic information system environment. Ecohydrology. 4(3), 663-672. doi: 10.22059/ije.2017.62494. (In Persian).
Zahedi, A.E. (2013). Determining areas susceptible to underground dam construction using water balance simulation (SWAT model) and analytical network process (ANP) in the study area: Dornagar Dargaz watershed. Master's thesis, Yazd University, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desertification, Watershed Management. (In Persian).
Zand, M., & Samai, R. (2017). Study of the amount and intensity of flood-producing rainfall in the Khorramabad watershed. Nivar, 41(96), 1-8. doi: 10.30467/nivar.2017.44813. (In Persian).