Analyzing the Effects of Urban Agriculture on Social Capital of Stakeholders at Razi University of Kermanshah

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

Urban agriculture with the aim of completing urban food needs, providing ecosystem and environmental services has multidimensional effects on increasing cultural and social values and even increasing economic resilience in any society. Urban agriculture is one of the most important factors affecting the increase of social capital. The present study was conducted simultaneously with the implementation of an urban agriculture plan (green garden) and with the aim of investigating the effects of urban agriculture on the social capital of stakeholders at Razi University of Kermanshah applying survey method. The statistical population of the study was 150 stakeholders, 108 of whom were selected as the sample size according to Krejcie Morgan’s table. The questionnaire method was used for data collection and its validity was confirmed by expert choice. The results of the study demonstrated that the effects of urban agriculture implementation on social capital have been greater in people who participate with family on farm. The findings from the evaluation of structural equation model showed that all dimensions of social cohesion, social interaction, social awareness, social trust and social participation at the level of 99% confidence have a positive effect on people' social capital. Thus, "social participation" with a path coefficient of 0.825 had the most significant effect on the social capital of the people and social awareness (with a path coefficient of 0.599) had the least significant effect on the social capital of the people. Therefore, this will provide the conditions for strengthening social interaction and participation, as well as social trust, and will pave the way for culture-building commensurate with the development of urban agriculture and the results obtained from it can be used in the process of planning and macro-agricultural policies and creating new social capital in the country.
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
With the increasing population of cities and the decrease of rural population, the destruction of agricultural lands and appearing the severity of the effects of environmental degradation caused by the growth of cities, managers and urban planners seek new solutions to solve urban crises. Urban agriculture with the aim of meeting urban food needs, providing ecosystem and environmental services, increasing cultural and social values ​​and even increasing economic resilience, has multidimensional effects in any community. Social capital is one of the important effects that urban agriculture can have on.
2- Materials and Methods
In the present study, the green garden project was implemented as one of the urban agricultural projects with an area of ​​6000 square meters at Razi University of Kermanshah. Then, the study was conducted as a survey method with the aim of investigating the effects of urban agriculture on the social capital of stakeholders. The statistical population of this study was 150 stakeholders, 108 of whom were selected as the sample size based on Krejcie Morgan table. Data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire in which, five components of social interaction, social cohesion, social participation, social trust and social awareness were used to measure social capital and its content validity was confirmed using the opinions of experts. After collecting and categorizing the data, data analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistics in SPSS21 software environment as well as structural equation modeling using Smart PLS3 software.
3- Results and Discussion
The results showed that 57.3% of the respondents were male and 42.7% were female, of which 71.9% were native to Kermanshah region. According to the findings of the study, 31.5% of the studied individuals were faculty members and 68.5% were non-faculty members. The results also showed that 88.8% of the respondents referred to the urban agricultural project as a family and 11.2% as an individual. The results of Friedman test to compare the dimensions of social capital among the individuals showed that the effects of urban agriculture on the dimensions of social capital are significantly different, so that the dimension of "social cohesion" with the highest average rank (3.89) and the dimension of "social awareness" with the lowest value of the average rank (1.76) were in the first and fifth place, respectively. The results of comparing the effects of urban agriculture on social capital based on the views of different groups revealed that the impact of urban agriculture on social capital with respect to "how to be present in agriculture" at the level of 99% confidence, had a significant difference with each other. In this regard, no significant differences were observed among the individuals with respect to "gender", "being native" and "occupation". The results for t-values ​​also proved this result. Therefore, the findings indicate that all dimensions of social cohesion, social interaction, social awareness, social trust and social participation had a positive effect on the social capital of stakeholders at 99% confidence level. Thus, the dimension of "social participation" with a path coefficient of 0.825 has the most significant impact on the social capital of the subjects and based on indigenous knowledge in strengthening the social network of users, increasing knowledge and awareness and the creation of trust within and outside the group has been effective, which has led to increased social interaction between stakeholders and their close participation and cooperation, has paved the way for solidarity and double cohesion among users. Within the dimensions of social capital, social participation had the greatest effect and social awareness had the least effect on the social capital of the subjects. In social participation, this can be due to the spirit of participation and interaction, and in social awareness, due to the lack of comprehensive and accurate information among stakeholders. Accordingly, the implementation of urban agriculture in the first place increases the spirit of solidarity and cooperation and then the existence of affectionate relationships among stakeholders, and on the other hand increases interaction between families, and reduces tensions between them.
4- Conclusion
The present study provides the conditions for strengthening social interaction and participation as well as social trust and has paved the way for a culture-building commensurate with the development of urban agriculture. The obtained results could be utilized in the planning process and macro-agricultural policy makings and creating new social capital in the country. Finally, considering that mutual trust is one of the essential factors for the success of any project, it is recommended to implement the administration and service steps of urban agricultural plans and projects in each region in a regular and accurate manner to build up the trust of the stakeholders.
 

Keywords

References

Alaimo, K., Packnett, E., Miles, R. A., & Kruger, D. J. (2008). Fruit and vegetable intake among urban community gardeners. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 40(2), 94-101.‏
Alvani, S. M., Nategh, T., & Farahi, M. M. (2007). The role of social capital in the development of organizational knowledge management. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 2(5), 35-70 (In Persian).
Artmann, M., Specht, K., Vávra, J., & Rommel, M. (2021). Introduction to the Special Issue “A Systemic Perspective on Urban Food Supply: Assessing Different Types of Urban Agriculture”. Sustainability, 13, 1-13.
Caputo, S., Schoen, V., Specht, K., Grard, B., Blythe, C., Cohen, N., Fox-Kämperb, R. Hawesf, J., Newell, J., & Poniży, L. (2021). Applying the food-energy-water nexus approach to urban agriculture: From FEW to FEWP (Food-Energy-Water-People). Urban forestry & urban greening, 58, 126934.‏
Christensen, S., Malberg Dyg, P., & Allenberg, K. (2019). Urban community gardening, social capital, and" integration"–a mixed method exploration of urban" integration-gardening" in Copenhagen, Denmark. Local Environment, 24(3), 231-248.‏
Colasanti, K. J., Hamm, M. W., & Litjens, C. M. (2012). The city as an" agricultural powerhouse"? Perspectives on expanding urban agriculture from Detroit, Michigan. Urban Geography, 33(3), 348-369.‏
Cultural Research Institute, Art and Communication (2020). A National Study of Citizens' Perspectives on Corona - First Wave. Opinion polling and public opinion group of the National Planning Office (In Persian).
Davarinejad, M., & Abadi, F. (2019). Investigating the necessity of urban agriculture in order to achieve health planning in Mashhad metropolis. Journal of Urban Design Studies and Urban Research, 2(4), 41-56 (In Persian).
Diekmann, L. O., Gray, L. C., & Thai, C. L. (2020). More than food: The social benefits of localized urban food systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 1-15.‏
FAO. (2020). Cities and local governments at the forefront in building inclusive and resilient food systems: key results from the FAO Survey “Urban Food Systems and COVID-19”. Revised Version; FAO: Rome, Italy.
Fazeli, M. (2020). Survey of the social dimensions of the corona crisis in Iran (In Persian).
Gallaher, C. M., Kerr, J. M., Njenga, M., Karanja, N. K., & WinklerPrins, A. M. (2013). Urban agriculture, social capital, and food security in the Kibera slums of Nairobi, Kenya. Agriculture and Human Values, 30(3), 389-404.‏
Graham, S., & Connell, J. (2006). Nurturing relationships: The gardens of Greek and Vietnamese migrants in Marrickville, Sydney. Australian Geographer, 37(3), 375-393.‏
Gulyas, B. Z., & Edmondson, J. L. (2021). Increasing city resilience through urban agriculture: Challenges and solutions in the Global North. Sustainability, 13(3), 1465.‏
Hamidi, K., & Yaghubi, J. (2014). Obstacles to the development of urban agriculture from the perspective of experts in promoting the Agricultural Jihad Organization of Zanjan Province. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 11(3), 59-68 (In Persian).
Hoseininia, Gh., Moghadas Farimani, Sh., & Rahimi Meshkin, F. (2016). Explaining the components of urban agricultural business: a case study of urban green roof. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education, 12(1), 85-101 (In Persian).
Kanosvamhira, T. P., & Tevera, D. (2020). Urban agriculture as a source of social capital in the Cape Flats of Cape Town. African Geographical Review, 39(2), 175-187.‏
Lin, B. B., Philpott, S. M., & Jha, S. (2015). The future of urban agriculture and biodiversity-ecosystem services: Challenges and next steps. Basic and applied ecology, 16(3), 189-201.‏
Mahmudi, M., & Tahmasbi, A. (2017). Investigating the relationship between humans and urban agriculture in stepped architecture and effective factors in its knowledge and experience of the environment, Fifth National Conference on Islamic Architecture and Urban Planning, Natanz (In Persian).
Mok, H. F., Williamson, V. G., Grove, J. R., Burry, K., Barker, S. F., & Hamilton, A. J. (2014). Strawberry fields forever? Urban agriculture in developed countries: a review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 34(1), 21-43.
Oberholtzer, L., Dimitri, C., & Pressman, A. (2014). Urban agriculture in the United States: characteristics, challenges, and technical assistance needs. Journal of Extension, 52(6), 1-12.
Olivier, D. W., & Heinecken, L. (2017). The personal and social benefits of urban agriculture experienced by cultivators on the Cape Flats. Development Southern Africa, 34(2), 168-181.‏
Peng, J., Liu, Z., Liu, Y., Hu, X., & Wang, A. (2015). Multifunctionality assessment of urban agriculture in Beijing City, China. Science of the Total Environment, 537, 343-351.‏
Petit-Boix, A., & Apul, D. (2018). From cascade to bottom-up ecosystem services model: How does social cohesion emerge from urban agriculture?. Sustainability, 10(4), 1-13.‏
Pölling, B., Mergenthaler, M., & Lorleberg, W. (2016). Professional urban agriculture and its characteristic business models in Metropolis Ruhr, Germany. Land use policy, 58, 366-379.‏
Poulsen, M. N., Neff, R. A., & Winch, P. J. (2017). The multifunctionality of urban farming: perceived benefits for neighbourhood improvement. Local Environ, 22, 1411–1427.
Pourias, J., Aubry, C., & Duchemin, E. (2016). Is food a motivation for urban gardeners? Multifunctionality and the relative importance of the food function in urban collective gardens of Paris and Montreal. Agric. Hum. Values, 33, 257–273.
Tehran Municipality. (2019). Survey from Tehran People about the Corona Epidemic - the second wave. ISPA (In Persian).
Tehran Municipality. (2020). Survey from Tehran People about the Corona Epidemic - the third wave. ISPA (In Persian).
The World Bank. (2013). Urban Agriculture: Findings from Four City Case Studies. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16273.
Vásquez-Moreno, L., & Córdova, A. (2013). A conceptual framework to assess urban agriculture’s potential contributions to urban sustainability: An application to San Cristobal de Las Casas, Mexico, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 5(2), 200-224.‏
Vávra, J., Megyesi, B., Duží, B., Craig, T., Klufová, R., Lapka, M., & Cudlínová, E. (2018). Food self‐provisioning in Europe: an exploration of sociodemographic factors in five regions. Rural Sociology, 83(2), 431-461.‏
Wakefield, S., Yeudall, F., Taron, C., Reynolds, J., & Skinner, A. (2007). Growing urban health: community gardening in South-East Toronto. Health promotion international, 22(2), 92-101.
Wästfelt, A., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Reclaiming localisation for revitalising agriculture: A case study of peri-urban agricultural change in Gothenburg, Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 172-185.‏
Zare, S., Namiranian, M., Shabanail Fami, H., & Ghasemi, J. (2010). The Role of Social Capital in Citizens' Participation in Forest Parks (Case Study: Tehran). Iranian Forest Journal, 2(4), 273-285 (In Persian).

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics