Evaluating the Effect of Environmental-Physical Factors on the Livability and Quality of Urban Streets (Case Study: Nader and Enghelab Streets in Sari City)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Urban planning, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.

2 Associated Professor, Department of Environmental Management Planning, Tehran University

Abstract

Today, urban traffic management is known as the most important factor affecting the livability of urban streets. But along with that, other environmental-physical factors also have a great effect on the livability and quality of these kinds of public realms. This paper aims to identify and evaluate environmental and physical factors affecting the livability and quality of urban streets and its impact on perceptions of street users. An exploratory sequential mixed method was adopted as the methodology of this research. Besides, the required data are collected through library resources and field surveys. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and Spearman correlation coefficient in SPSS software. Findings of the research indicate that there is a significant relationship between the livability of the studied streets and some physical-environmental problems like poor lighting, improper walkway paving, improper and inadequate vegetation, low width of sidewalks, inadequate facilities for disabled people, and improper access to public transportation, inadequate parking spaces, traffic congestion, inadequate public services and maintenance. In fact, the quality and livability of these streets are decreased with the increase of such problems. Moreover, the analysis of street users' perception of the livability and quality of the streets indicates a higher level of livability in Nader Street.
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
A "livable  urban  street" is an urban space in which the presence of a significant number of people and their diversity (in terms of age and gender) over a wide range of days, will be seen when their activities are mainly selective or social (khastoo,Rezvani,1389:66). According to the above definition, the street of the city is recognized as the main symbol of the social interactions that the streets of the world's prestigious cities have usually benefited from.  However, our country, Iran has always faced difficulties and deep issues mostly due to over-physical development, lack of proper planning, and the application of some non-principled policies and procedures in facing urban streets and ignoring its central role in creating an environment for pause and social interactions.  Lack of attention to urban furniture, lack of variety of activities during different hours of the day, lack of appropriate lighting and vegetation, lack of easy access to public transportation and parking space are a part of environmental problems which affect the active participation of the people, leading to the livability of the urban streets and the physical and mental health of citizens. Considering the above-mentioned cases, the importance of the studied arterial streets in terms of high daily traffic of citizens and their significant presence in these spaces, the presence of identity elements like HOLY SHRINE, the traditional market in the studied areas, the promotion of physical -environmental quality and its impact on the livability of the streets and perception of users are of great importance. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to identify the environmental and physical problems of the streets of the Nader and Enghelab of the city of Sari and assess their impact on the quality and livability of these streets.
2-Materials and Methods
An exploratory sequential mixed method was adopted as the methodology of this research. The quantitative and qualitative approaches were taken separately to answer the research questions. Studied streets’ environmental-physical features were considered as independent variables and their quality and livability were taken as dependent variables. Direct observation was accompanied by photographs and field notes to collect the qualitative data reaching an accurate visual appraisal of the studied streets’ physical-environmental problems. The studied streets were visited at different times, during the night, day, weekends, raining times and special events of the year to make sure that the quality of all attributes are examined and all problems are identified. At the second phase, questionnaires were designed specifically for each street. This questionnaire survey tended to uncover the users’ view point towards the identified physical-environmental problems of these spaces and their impact on streets’ livability. The analysis of physical-environmental impacts on the quality and livability of streets were analyzed by applying descriptive statistics and spearman coefficient correlation among the research streets’ quality and livability as the dependent variables and physical-environmental streets problems as the independent variable.
3-Results and Discussion
The related findings to the streets were evaluated in order to have a better understanding of the effects of environmental-physical factors on the livability and the quality of urban streets. The results of the correlation analysis in streets showed that the problems like improper walkway paving, poor lighting, improper and inadequate vegetation, low width of sidewalks, inadequate facilities for disabled people, improper access to public transportation, inadequate parking spaces, traffic congestion, inadequate public services and maintenance had negative correlation with the livability of both studied streetscapes.  Research shows that traffic congestion and inadequate parking space, as two important factors, strongly affect the deterioration of livability in both studied streets. In terms of green space, insufficient vegetation in Enghelab Street has a negative effect on the livability of this street.
4-Conclusion
In connection with identified problems, four operational recommendations are presented to improve the environmental-physical quality of the streets which can be generalized to other arterial streets of Sari. The first action plan is the provision of facilities such as suitable street furniture and seating, adequate shelter, facilities for disabled people and adequate parking space. The second one is the quality enhancement of existing facilities and services like public transportation systems, public services, landscaping and planting. The third is the redesign, renovation, maintenance of some elements, like pavements, old and abandoned buildings and facades, and the reduction of the contrast between the architectural styles of new and old buildings. Besides, preserving and improvement of historical attractions and identification of the old fabric of  Sari city as the center of the social life , utilization of valuable historical  buildings  and environments, maintaining and developing public services, open and green urban spaces, allocation of valuable urban environments(pathways and historical open spaces), allocation of pathways in the textures passing through the main historical passages and YAHYA holy shrine area and traditional market, in modern pattern combined with the existing structure of the city will play a significant role in enhancing the vitality and quality of the studied streets. Additionally, the government must educate people on urban maintenance and cleaning issues. Without people taking care, municipalities will not be able to keep the city livable and clean. Furthermore, education is needed to encourage the use of public transportation, although private vehicles and walkability promotion would be effective in preserving and restoring of urban streets livability. The supervision and law enforcement in city image field is another municipalities role which should be taken more seriously.

Keywords


احمدی، مارال (1392) امنیّت و کیفیّت محیط و زندگی در بافت فرسودة تاریخی (نمونة موردی: محلّة تاریخی امامزاده یحیی (ع)) ، نشریة اینترنتی نوسازی، 5 (21)، صص. 19-1.
ادیبی سعدی‌نژاد، فاطمه؛ عظیمی، آزاده (1390) تبیین امنیّت در محیط شهری بر مبنای پارامترهای کالبدی و طرّاحی (مورد شهر بابلسر)، آمایش محیط، 4، صص. 106-81.
پاکزاد، جهانشاه (1386) مبانی نظری و فرآیند طراحی شهری، چاپ دوّم، انتشارات شهیدی، تهران.
حسینی، سید باقر؛ نوروزیان ملکی، سعید (1387) مناسب‌سازی مسکن و شهر برای افراد دارای ناتوانی‌های جسمی - حرکتی (نمونة موردی: منطقة 8 شهر تهران)،  نشریة بین‌المللی علوم مهندسی، 19 (10)، صص. 206-197.
خستو، مریم؛ رضوانی، نوید (1389) عوامل مؤثّر بر سرزندگی فضاهای شهری، هویت شهر، 4 (6)، صص. 74-63.
شوای، فرانسوا (1375) شهرسازی تخیّلات و واقعیّات، ترجمة سید محسن حبیبی، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
طبیبیان، منوچهر (1382) گزیدة منظر شهری، چاپ چهارم، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
طبیبیان، منوچهر؛ موسوی، میرجلال (1395) بررسی نقش زیباسازی و ارتقاء کیفیّت محیط بر سرزندگی شهری (نمونة موردی: باغ‌شهر تاریخی مراغه)، معماری و شهرسازی آرمانشهر، 17، صص. 262-249.
گلکار، کوروش (1386) مفهوم کیفیّت سرزندگی در طرّاحی شهری، صفه، 16 (41)، صص. 75-66.
مؤیدی، محمد (۱۳۹۲) ضرورت برنامه‌ریزی فضاهای عمومی شهری بومی بر مبنای الگوی ایرانی - اسلامی به‎منظور ارتقاء سطح هویت شهری، دومین همایش ملّی معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی، تبریز، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز.
Appleyard, D. (1981) Livable streets, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Appleyard, D., Lintell, M. (1972) The Environmental Quality of City Streets: The Residents Viewpoint, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38 (2), pp. 84-101.
Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S., Smith, G. (1985) Responsiveenvironments: A Manual for Designer, Architectural Press, Oxford.
Biddulph, M. (2001) Home Zones: A Planning and Design Handbook. Bristol: Policy Press.
Bosselmann, P., Macdonald, E., Kronemeyer, T. (1999) Livable streets revisited. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65 (2), pp. 168-180.
Carmona, M., Heath, T. Oc, T., Tiesdell, S. (2006) Public Places - Urban Spaces, Architectural Press, London.
Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L., Stone, A. (1992) Public Space, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Cherulnik, P. D. (1993) Applications of Environment-Behavior Research, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Clayden, A, Mckoy, K, Wild, A. (2006) Improving Resindential Liveability in the UK: Home Zones and Alternative Approaches, Urban Design, 11 (1), pp. 55-71.
Cullen, G. (1961) The Concise TownScape, Architectural Press, United Kingdom.
Forsyth, A., Hearst, M., Oakes, J. M., Schmitz, K. H. (2008) Design and Destinations: Factors Influencing Walking and Total Physical Activity, Urban Studies, 45 (9), pp. 1973-1996.
Gehl, J. (1987) Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Gjerde, M. (2011) Visual Evaluation of Urban Streetscapes: How do Public Preferences Reconcile with Those Held by Experts?, Urban Design International, 16 (3), pp. 153-161.
Hedman, R., Jaszewski, A. (1984) Fundamentals of Urban Design, APA Planners Press, Washington D.C.
Hodgson, F. C., Turner, J. (2003) Participation not Consumption: the Need for New Participatory Practices to Address Transport and Social Exclusion, Transport Policy, 10 (4), 265-272.
Jacobs, A., Appleyard, D. (1987) Toward an Urban Design Manifesto, Journal of the American Planning Association, 53 (1), pp. 112-120.
Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York.
Jalaladdini, S., Oktay, D. (2012) Urban Public Spaces and Vitality: A Socio-Spatial Analysis in The Streets of Cypriot Towns, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, pp. 664-674.
Low, S., Smith, N. (2006) The Politic of Public Space, Routledge, New York.
Lynch, K. (1981) A Theory of Good City from, MT Press, Cambridge.
Mackett, R. L., Achuthan, K., Titheridge, H. (2008) AMELIA: making streets more accessible for people with mobility difficulties, Urban Design International, 13 (2), pp. 80-89.
Mahmoudi, M., Ahmad, F., Abbasi, B. (2015) Livable Streets: The Effects of Physical Problems on the Quality and Livability of Kuala Lumpur Streets, Cities, 43, pp. 104-114.
Marcus, C., Francis, C. (1998) People Places: Design Guideline for Urban Open Spaces, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.
Mesbahul Tariq, M. (2007) Livable Streetscape: Creating a Pedestrian Network in the Town of Morden, Monitoba. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space, Guilford, New York.
Mongomery, J. (1995). Editorial Urban Vitality and the Culture of Cities, Planning Practice and Research, 10 (2), pp. 101-110.
Nasar, J. L. (1998) The Evaluative Image of the City, Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, California.
Oldenburg, R. (1989) The Great Good Place: Cafes,Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parols, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You through the Day, Paragon House, New York.
Park, S. (2008) Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on Transit Users’ Mode Choice and Walking Distance to the Station, University of California , Berkeley.
Portella, A. (2007) Evaluating Commercial Signs in Historic Streetscapes: the Effects of the Control of Advertising and Signage on User’s Sense of Environmental Quality, Oxford Brookes University.
Pushkarev, B., Zupan, J. (1975) Urban Space for Pedestrians, MIT Press, Cambridge, United States.
Rubenstein, H. M. (1992) Pedestrian Malls, Streetscapes, and Urban Spaces, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.
Säumel, I., Weber, F., Kowarik, I. (2016) Toward Livable and Healthy Urban Streets: Roadside Vegetation Provides Ecosystem Services Where People Live and Move, Environmental Science&Policy, 62, pp. 24-33.
Sauter, D., Huettenmoser, M. (2008). Liveable Streets and Social Inclusion, Urban Design International, 13 (2), pp. 67-79.
Shaftoe, H. (2008) Convivial Urban Spaces: Creating Effective Public Places, Earthscan, United Kingdaom.
Shamsuddin, S., Ujang, N. (2008) Making Places: The Role of Attachment in Creating the Sense of Place for Traditional Streets in Malaysia, Habitat International, 32 (3), pp. 399-409.
Takano, T., Nakamura, K., Watanabe, M. (2002) Urban Residential Environments and Senior Citizens' Longevity in Megacity Areas. The Importance of Walkable Green Spaces, Epidemiol Community Health, 56 (12), pp. 913-918.
Toronto Public Health. (2014) Healthy Streets: Design Features & Benefits, Healthy Public Policy Directorate, Ontario.
Wagner, F., Caves, R. ( 2012) Community Livability: Issues and Approaches to Sustaining the Well-Being of People and Communities, Routledge, London.
Whyte, W. H. (1988) City: Rediscovering the Center, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc, New York.