Sustainability Measurement of Farming System in Isfahan Agricultural Sector (Smallholders-Rural Production Cooperatives- Farm Corporation)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 asistant of isfahan rural cooperative society

2 ACADEMIC STAFF

Abstract

Low productivity in agricultural sector, inappropriate use of production factors to enhance product performance during the last decade as a result of adverse environmental degradation and the need for sustainable production and food security prove the importance of the sustainability of the agricultural farming systems. This study is aimed to assess the sustainability of agricultural farming system, including smallholders, rural production cooperatives and Farm Corporation. The statistical population consisted of 17362 members of rural production cooperatives, 635 members of Farm Corporation and 85405 smallholders. The sample size is calculated by using Cochran formula and the appropriate assignment to each cooperatives and smallholders.  The results showed that the standardized complex index of farm Corporations and rural production cooperatives are semi stable while smallholder system is unstable. Dimension farm Corporation is economically more stable than the other two systems, while less stable than the others with social dimension. Besides, social dimension of rural production cooperatives is more stable than other two farming systems. Moreover, environmental dimension is less stable to farm Corporation. Smallholder farming system in term of three dimensions especially economic dimension which is unstable. Economic strengthening small farmers system could be regared due to the fact that is a major percentage of farmers in Iran to increase the sector's degree of sustainability.
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
Low productivity in the agricultural sector, inappropriate use of production factors to enhance product performance during the last decade as a result of adverse environmental degradation and the need for sustainable production and food security prove the importance of sustainability of the agricultural farming systems. The basic condition for the sustainable use of nature is the observation of natural resources capacity. Indeed, this capacity is also determined by analysis or stability measurement. Stability Analysis is the basis and criteria to determine environmental standards in order to show the utilization of resources and control screw. Analysis the degree of stability in a decisive and stable condition and the measurement of the distance between the original and the new situation are considered as peripheral phenomena. At the same time the analysis of resource capacity and economic sustainability are analyze and controled in relation to production needs. Stability measurement is a complex interaction between technology, the environment and society.
Farming systems are the most important and fundamental issue in agriculture sector in any country. In Iran, the biggest obstacle to the agricultural development and the realization of its strategic goals and structural barriers are related to farming systems. The optimal use of soil and water resources and increase production and productivity per unit, improve the quality of agricultural products through the  land consolidation,training, promotion and application of modern agricultural science and technology, promotion of mechanization, scientific management, proper use of existing facilities with an emphasis on restoring an preserving the environment and prevent the destruction or waste of resources changing  the hardware systems and even removing barriers, expand the area under cultivation or solving this structural problem, the creation of a qualitative transformation in the structure of agriculture, especially in agricultural systems are related to farming system.
2- Material and Methods
As a matter of fact, it was impossible to collect data of 17362, 635, and 85405 farmers belonged to agriculture cooperatives, farm corporation and smallholder farmers, respectively due to geographical scope of the research included the province of Isfahan, and the widespread distribution of the statistical population. Therefore, it was decided to take samples. The sample size was calculated using Cochran's formula. Moreover, the sample size for each company and smallholder farmers systems were calculated by proportional assignment. Using random sampling method, the beneficiaries’ sample was selected. This research has been conducted as a combined study (quantitative and qualitative), applied research, descriptive (non-experimental) and the cross-sectional surveys. The date  needed for documentary and field research (questionnaires and interviews) were collected. In this study, Shannon entropy method was used to analyze the data collected.
3- Results and Discussion
The development of agriculture is not only an underlying necessity in the society, but also an inevitable extremity. The results from various studies suggest that the improvement of the agricultural production shall not be achieved unless the farming system is revised and reformed in line with the principles of a sustainable agriculture as the pivot of agricultural developments. The results show that small farming system is unstable in 17 villages, while in 10 villages is semi stable and the remaining 2 villages are in stable condition. Besides, 12 rural production cooperatives have unstable condition, eight cooperatives in a semi stable and remaining consist of eight rural production cooperatives are in stable condition, farming stock corporation is in stable condition. Farming Corporation is more stable in economic and environmental dimensions than the other two farming systems. In social dimension as membership in the local community, participation in agricultural activities small farming system is more stable than the other two farming systems, in economic dimension is unstable and in environmental dimension is semis table. Rural production cooperatives are unstable in economic and environmental dimensions and semi stable in social dimension.
Farming Corporation is semi stable in economic and social dimensions and unstable in environmental. Increased using of nitrogen fertilizers, phosphate and pesticides have caused instability in all three types of farming systems. The magnitude of the instability is less in farming corporation than other two farming system for reasons of using technical factors.
4- Conclusions
The average total income by production in smallholder farmers system is considered as one of unsustainable indices in the region, so certificating a price proportional to the production costs will be beneficial to increase the agricultural income. Despite applying the relatively new science and technology in planting, growing, and harvesting operations, the same index is unsustainable in thefarm corporation system, mainly due to the impact of the amount of dividends paid to cooperative members for the ability of managers. So, it is emphasized that related governmental organization pay special attention to pick out the qualified candidates for the Board of Directors in order to committee the managers and specialists with high throughput in the field of agriculture.
Due to unsustainability of farm corporation in terms of the social dimension, it is recommended to apply innovative methods and cooperative approach in the formation of t. Besides, it is important to participate in these corporations during their establishment which depends on the performance of the corporations’ managers.
Considering the fact that all three types of farming systems are unsustainable in terms of environmental dimension (smallholder farmers is most unsustainable, followed by rural production cooperatives and Farm Corporation), it shows few applied research conducted in this sector leading to the improvement of agricultural products and application ofnative technology in accordance with cultivation environment. Efficient research and development centers are essential to solve the environmental unsustainability in various aspects of agricultural production, which should be on the agenda of the agricultural research and development centers.

Keywords


آذر، عادل؛ رجب‌زاده، علی (1391) تصمیم‌گیری کاربردی رویکرد MADM، چاپ دوّم، انتشارات نگاه دانش، تهران.
اشرفی، مرتضی؛ هوشمند، محمود؛ کرامت‌زاده، علی (1393) بررسی توسعة پایدار کشاورزی در مناطق روستایی با تأکید بر رهیافت اقتصادی (مطالعة موردی روستاهای شهرستان کاشمر)، راهبردهای توسعة روستایی، 1 (2)، صص. 68-51.
امینی فسخودی، عباس؛ نوری، سیّد هدایت‌الله (1390) ارزیابی پایداری و تعیین الگوی کشت سیستم‌های زراعی با استفاده از الگوهای غیر خطّی برنامه‌ریزی ریاضی، مجلّة علوم و فنون کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، علوم آب‌وخاک، 15 (55)، صص. 111-99.
رکن‌الدّین افتخاری، عبدالرضا؛ آقایاری هیر، محسن (1386). سطح‌بندی پایداری توسعة روستایی، مطالعة موردی بخش هیر، پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی، 39 (61)، صص.40-31.
زاهدی، شمس السّادات (1386) توسعة پایدار، چاپ اول، انتشارات سمت، تهران.
ساداتی‌پور، سید احمد (1388)، سنجش پایداری در نظام بهره‌برداری دهقانی و شناخت عوامل پیش‌برندة آن در شهرستان بهبهان، استاد راهنما: حسین شعبانعلی فمی، پایان نامة کارشناسی ارشد توسعة روستایی،پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران.
سازمان مرکزی تعاون روستایی ایران (1394) واحد آمار و اطّلاعات ادارة کلّ نظام بهره‌برداری.
شریفی، امید؛ رضایی، روح‌الله؛ برومند، ناصر (1390) بررسی عوامل مؤثّر بر پایداری نظام کشت گلخانه‌ای در منطقة جیرفت و کهنوج، تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، 42 (1)، صص.152-143.
عباسی‌زاده قنواتی، محمد صادق (1390) سنجش میزان پایداری نظام بهره‌برداری خانوادگی و تعیین عوامل بازدارنده و پیش‌برندة آن در روستای خانم‌آباد کرمانشاه، استاد راهنما: عبدالحمید پاپ‌زن،پایان نامة کارشناسی ارشد توسعة روستایی، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه.
عبدالهی، محمد (1377) نظام بهره‌برداری کشاورزی در ایران، وزارت کشاورزی، معاونت امور نظام بهره‌برداری، دفتر طراحی نظام بهره‌برداری، چاپ اوّل، انتشارات دفتر نشر و فرهنگ اسلامی.
عربیون، ابوالقاسم؛ کلانتری، خلیل؛ اسدی، علی؛ شعبانعلی فمی، حسین (1388) سنجش پایداری نظام کشت گندم در استان فارس و تعیین عوامل مؤثّر بر آن، علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، 5 (2)، صص. 28-17.
عوض‌زاده، سید علی؛ کرمی، آیت‌اله (1394) تبیین پایداری نظام بهره‌برداری خرد دهقانی (مطالعة موردی بخش مرکزی شهرستان بویر احمد)، راهبردهای توسعة روستایی، 2 (1)، صص. 41-27.
Alexander, W. G. (2009) Cooperation in the European Market Economics, Bombay, Asia Publishing, 2 (10), pp. 540-549.
Becker, B. (1997) Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Values, Concepts, and Methodological Approaches. Issues in Agriculture 10, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR),The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Calker, K. J. V., Berentsen, P. B. M., Giesen, G. W. J., Huirne, R. (2005) Identifying and Ranking Attributes that Determine Sustainability in Dutch Dairy Farming, Agricultural and Human,22 (1), pp. 53-63.
Castodeli, N., Bechini, L. (2010) Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Ceopping System with Agro-Ecological and Economic Indicators in Northern Italy, European Journal of Agronomy, 32 (1), pp. 59-72.
Claudia R. B, Giuseppe, F., Julia, K. S. (2010) Considerind the normative systemic and procedural dimentions in indicatore- based sustainability assesments in agriculture, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30 (2), pp. 71-81.
Gafsi, M., Legagneux, B., Nguyen, G., Robin, P. (2006) Towards Sustainable Farming System: Effectiveness and Deficiency of the French Procedure of Sustainable Agriculture, Agricultural Systems, 90 (1-3), pp. 226-242.
Hansen, J. W. (1996) Is Agriculture Sustainability a Useful Concept? Agric System, 12 (50), pp. 117-143.
John, L., Adrin, Jr., Thomas Wade, G. (2001) Agricultural Cooperative Managers and Business Environment, Agribusiness, 1 (19), pp.17-33.
Krishnaraj, M. (2005) Establishment of Rural Cooperatives: An Essential Steps Towards Rural Development, Unpublished paper, Institute of Business,Administration, University of Dhaka, pp. 211-230.
Lawson, R (2000) Cooperatives and Poor: A Review within the Cooperative Movement, Geneva, International Labor Office.
Smith, C. S., McDonald, G. T. (1998) Assessing the Sustainability of Agriculture at the Planning Stage, Environment Management, 52 (1), pp. 15-37.
Sydrovych, O., Wossink, A. (2008) The Meaning of Agricultural Sustainability: Evidence from a Congoint Choice Survey, Agricultural Systems, 98 (1), pp. 10-20.
Von Wiren Lehr, S. (2001) Sustainability in Agriculture - An Evaluation of Principal Goal -Oriented Concepts to Close the Gap between Theory and Practice Agricuture, Ecosystems and Environment 84 (2), pp. 115-129.