Development Bridges: Providing Effective Approaches to Create Sustainable Development in Rural Areas

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Geography and Urban and Rural Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

2 Department of Public Administration and Tourism, Faculty of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

Abstract

The sustainable development of rural areas is one of the main programs of governments, which has been receiving attention for a long time. Sustainable development in villages can bring a lot of benefits in different economic, social, political, etc. dimensions. The main goal of the current research is to identify and prioritize effective approaches in order to create sustainable development in rural areas. The current research method is mixed, which investigates the issue using a sequential exploratory approach. In the first phase, the qualitative method of the focus group was used, and the corresponding codes were extracted by using semi-structured interviews and forming three consecutive groups. Then, in the second phase, each of the themes and indicators was prioritized using the quantitative weighting assignment (WA) method. The participants of both phases were from the academic and executive fields, and the first phase, used the purposive sampling method; in the second phase, interviews and questionnaires were collected using the stratified sampling method. According to the research findings, 134 primary codes, 46 key codes, 20 integrative codes, and 4 overarching categories were extracted, which are the main components and indicators of sustainable development in rural areas, which are considered as development bridges. From the results of the present research, the importance of supporting entrepreneurship and rural empowerment projects; providing long-term and easily accessible banking facilities and services; Rural strategic planning and management; and Improving the mechanism and necessary fields for attracting capital in the rural environment pointed out that they can provide favorable conditions for the implementation of various plans and projects in order to create sustainable development in rural areas.
 
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
In recent years, rural areas have become important places with great potential to create significant synergies to achieve sustainable rural development. However, in achieving sustainable rural development, there are obstacles that must be scientifically and carefully investigated and implemented. In most developing countries, the Rural Development Degree (RDD) largely reflects the degree of socio-economic development and national modernization. According to the latest statistics announced by Iran Statistics Center, about 74 percent of the country's population lives in urban areas and less than 26 percent in rural areas. These official statistics show that despite the excessive migration to cities and the existence of numerous problems in the villages, nearly 30 percent of the country's population still lives in the villages, and paying attention to the sustainable development of these areas is one of the main needs of these areas.
For a long time, rural areas have been considered the most important economic activity for centuries. For this reason, many countries are trying to create sustainable development in villages by adopting different strategies and programs. Rural development is a set of activities and actions of different actors - individuals, organizations, and groups - which together lead to progress in rural areas. Therefore, in this research, the main goal is to identify and prioritize effective solutions to create sustainable development in rural areas, which takes place in the context of development and related concepts.
 
2-Materials and Methods
The current research is applied in terms of purpose and of a mixed type. The approach used in it is a sequential exploratory approach that is carried out in two qualitative and quantitative phases. Thus, in the first phase, using the qualitative method of "focus group", through semi-structured interviews, the desired information is collected and categorized in the form of themes; Then in the second phase, that is, the quantitative phase; Using the quantitative Weighting Assignment (WA) Method, each of the themes have been approved or rejected by experts. Due to the limitations of access to some experts and the spread of the coronavirus, the online focus group method was used in this research, and the interviews were collected in the online environment of one of the social applications. Semi-structured interviews were collected between May 2021 and April 2022. The geographical area under study is the villages of Alborz province, and each of the experts has full knowledge about the characteristics of this province and most of its villages. Three main categories were involved in these groups. The first group includes 6 experts in the field of urban and rural management and planning; The second group consists of 5 experts in public administration and sustainable development, and the third group, which is a collective group, consists of 8 experts in geography, urban and rural planning, and village executives who have executive and academic experience in this field in each of the interviews, the raw data were extracted independently and the initial reflections were discussed and using the "three-axis coding framework" in accordance with the inductive approach (moving from part to whole), the process of coding and extracting themes began, and continued until the theoretical saturation stage.
 
3- Results and Discussion
In the first phase, themes and indicators were extracted using semi-structured interviews. The main topic of each interview was done with reference to rural development evaluation indicators. And each of the interviews of the first, second, and third categories were conducted and analyzed in line with these axes. The time of each interview was 1 to 2 hours, which was recorded and transcribed. The reason for using semi-structured interviews was that the researcher used a semi-structured interview guide with pre-planned instructions to ensure that the same main questions were asked for all groups. Also, the index items of rural development evaluation were given to the relevant experts before the start of the focus group meeting. Finally, 134 primary or raw codes, 46 key codes, 20 Integrative codes, and 4 overarching codes were extracted.
After collecting the interviews; According to the three-axis coding framework, primary codes are extracted first, and then it is time to categorize the centralized codes and finally systematic coding. In the following, the themes (components) and indicators of creating sustainable development in rural areas are stated. It should be noted that the indicators are the result of systematic coding, And the components or themes are the result of the classification of systematic codes. Four main themes or components have been identified with 20 related indicators, which are the components and indicators of creating sustainable development in rural areas, according to the quantitative phase, all the components were approved by the experts.
 
4- Conclusion
Achieving the sustainable development of rural areas is not only a big challenge for the development of rural areas, but also the vision and goal of the future development of rural areas, especially for our country, Iran, where a large number of its population lives in villages. The above themes and indicators, each of which can play a role as bridges for sustainable rural development, suggest different approaches in this field. In relation to smart rural governance and grassroots people, which was raised as one of the main themes; In our country, it has been emphasized many times that the crisis is lurking in the villages and good governance should be the priority of the government. Sustainable rural development, while creating such economic and social structures that can generate income for residents, meet their diverse approaches and needs, and improve access to public goods and services, and at the same time, the negative effects of phenomena such as weak rural economy, unemployment, migration unreasonably reduce the cities and even old and new theories confirm these things. Sustainable rural development can be developed in different ways. According to the first theme, the smart village is one of the things that seems to be useful in the current conditions of the country.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abreu, I., Nunes, J.M., & Mesias, F.J. (2019). Can rural development be measured? Design and application of a synthetic index to Portuguese municipalities. Social Indicators Research., 145(2019), 1107-1123. doi: 10.1007/s11205-019-02124-w.
Adamowicz, M., & Zwolińska-Ligaj, M. (2020). The “Smart Village” as a way to achieve sustainable development in rural areas of Poland. Sustainability, 12 (16). doi: 6503,10.3390/su12166503
Adelle, C., Delputte, S., De Roeck, F., & Nicholson, S. (2018). Environmental instruments in development cooperation: promoting better development and environmental outcomes?. European Union External Environmental Policy: Rules, Regulation and Governance Beyond Borders, 81-101. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60931-7_5‏
Akgün, A. A., Baycan, T., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). Rethinking on sustainable rural development. European Planning Studies, 23(4), 678-692. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.945813
Alados, C.L., Errea, P., Gartzia, M., Saiz, H. & Escós, J. (2014). Positive and negative feedbacks and free-scale pattern distribution in rural-population dynamics. PLoS One, 9(12), Article e114561. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0114561
Ashrafi, M., Hooshmand, M., & Keramatzadeh, A. (2014). Investigation of Agricultural Sustainable Development in Rural Areas, With an Emphasis on Economic Approach: A Case Study of Kashmar Villages. Rural Development Strategies, 1(2), 51-68.‏ doi: 10.22048/rdsj.2014.6007 (In Persian).
Babazadeh, K., Amirkabiri, A., Jamshidi Avanaki, M. & Rabee Mandchin, M. R. (2022). Explaining the Effect of Integrated Institutionalism on the Sustainable Development of the Villages in West Azerbaijan Province. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 12(1), 1-17. doi: 10.22126/GES.2022.7071. 2464 (In Persian).
Bénassy-Quéré, A., & Weder di Mauro, B. (2020). Europe in the time of Covid-19: A new crash test and a new opportunity. Europe in the Time of Covid, 19, 1-20.‏ https://cepr.org/voxeu/ columns/europe-time-covid-19-new-crash-test-and-new-opportunity.
Burja, C. & Burja, V. (2014). Sustainable development of rural areas: A challenge for Romania. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 13, 1861–1871, http://www.eemj.icpm.tuiasi. ro/pdfs/vol13/no8/Full/ 2_161_Burja_14
Camaioni, B., Coderoni, S., Esposti, R., & Pagliacci, F. (2019). Drivers and indicators of the EU rural development expenditure mix across space: Do neighbourhoods matter?. Ecological Indicators, 106, 105505. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105505
Casini, L., Boncinelli, F., Gerini, F., Romano, C., Scozzafava, G., & Contini, C. (2021). Evaluating rural viability and well-being: Evidence from marginal areas in Tuscany. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 64-75.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.002
Castro-Arce, K., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010
Chen, Z., Li, Y. & Liu, Y. (2017). Distribution pattern characteristic and type classification of rural settlements in loess hilly-gully region. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering., 33(14), 266-274, https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tcsae/tcsae/2017/ 00000033/00000014/art00036
Chen, Y., Huang, X. & Wang, L. (2018). China's rural revitalization and its evaluation from the perspective of multifunctional theory. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning. 39(6), 201-209. doi:10.1007/s11442-020-1819-3
Clausen, L. T., & Rudolph, D. (2020). Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: Synergies and mismatches. Energy Policy, 138, 111289. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111289
Dudek, M. (2018). Opportunities and barriers for smart rural development in Poland in light of field studies. Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), 11 (673-2019-912), 57-68. doi: 10.2478/ers-2018-0035
Esmerino, E. A., Ferraz, J. P., Tavares Filho, E. R., Pinto, L. P., Freitas, M. Q., Cruz, A. G., & Bolini, H. M. (2017). Consumers' perceptions toward 3 different fermented dairy products: Insights from focus groups, word association, and projective mapping. Journal of dairy science, 100(11), 8849-8860. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12533
ESPON, E. (2017). Shrinking rural regions in Europe. Towards smart and innovative approaches to regional development challenges in depopulating rural regions, Policy Brief, 1–14, European Union, Luxemburg, https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments
Esteban-Salvador, L., Gargallo-Castel, A.F. & Pérez-Sanz, J. (2020). Environmental practices in firms located in underpopulated rural areas in Spain: the case of the province of teruel International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2020), p. 8993. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238993.
Fernández-Martínez, P., de Castro-Pardon, M., Barroso, V.M. & Azevedo, J.C. (2020). Assessing sustainable rural development based on ecosystem services vulnerability. Land, 9(7), 222-245. doi: 10.3390/land9070222.
Gan, L., Wang, L., Hu, Z., Lev, B., Gang, J., & Lan, H. (2022). Do geologic hazards affect the sustainability of rural development? Evidence from rural areas in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 130693.‏ doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130693
Ghasemi Ardahaee, A., Noubakht, R., & Rostami, N. (2017). Youth retention in rural areas, a prerequisite for sustainable rural entrepreneurship and employment. Rural Development Strategies, 4(2), 265-279.‏ doi: 10.22048/rdsj.2017.62695.1583 (In Persian).
Govindan, K. (2018). Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 419-431. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.003
Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological indicators, 60, 565-573. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
Hospers, G. J., Reverda, N., Hospers, G. J., & Reverda, N. (2015). The geography of population decline. Managing Population Decline in Europe's Urban and Rural Areas, 29-37. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12412-4_4.
Iran Statistics Center. (2016). Population Estimates. https://www.amar.org.ir.
Javadinejad, S., Ostad-Ali-Askari, K. & Jafary, F. (2019). Using simulation model to determine the regulation and to optimize the quantity of chlorine injection in water distribution networks. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 5(3), 1015-1023. doi: 10.1007/s40808-019-00587-x
Jayasekara, R. S. (2012). Focus groups in nursing research: methodological perspectives. Nursing outlook, 60(6), 411-416, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2012.02.001
Kapucu, N., Hawkins, C. V., & Rivera, F. I. (2013). Disaster preparedness and resilience for rural communities. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 4(4), 215-233, doi: 10.1002/rhc3. 12043
King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010) Interviews in qualitative research. Sage, London. https://books. oogle.com/books/about/Interviews_in_Qualitative_Research.html?id=iOsnITKC48gC
Komorowski, Ł., & Stanny, M. (2020). Smart villages: Where can they happen?. Land, 9(5), 151. doi: 10.3390/land9050151
Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2015), https://books.google.com/books/about/Focus_Groups.html?id= ySKeSZeWywMC
Li, X., & Liu, X. (2012). Comparative analysis on the weight assigning methods of land evaluation index. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University., 47(05), 129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol. 2018.08.007
Li, Y., Long, H & Liu, Y. (2015). Spatio-temporal pattern of china's rural development: a rurality index perspective. Journal of Rural Studies., 38(2015), 12-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015. 01.004
López-Penabad, M. C., Iglesias-Casal, A., & Rey-Ares, L. (2022). Proposal for a sustainable development index for rural municipalities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, 131876. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131876
Liu, Y. (2018). Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(4), 637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
Liu, Y. (2019). Research on the geography of rural revitalization in the new era. Geographical Research., 38(3), 461-466. http://www.geog.com.cn/EN/10.11821/dlxb201804004
Liu, K., & Lin, B. (2019). Research on influencing factors of environmental pollution in china: a spatial econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production., 206(2019): 356-364. doi: 10. 1016/j.jclepro.2018. 09.194
Liu, X., Liu, Z., Zhong, H., Jian, Y., & Shi, L. (2021). Multi-dimension evaluation of rural development degree and its uncertainties: A comparison analysis based on three different weighting assignment methods. Ecological Indicators, 130, 108096. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind. 2021.108096
Madani, J. (2022). Investigating the Role of Rural Tourism in the Development of Sustainable Employment of Residents in the Post-Corona Era with a Scenario Approach (Case Study: Sarein County). Journal of Rural Research. 13(3), 390-407. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2022.336852. 1711 (In Persian).
Martínez-Vega, J., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D., Fernández-Latorre, F.M; Ibarra, P; Echeverría, M., & Echavarría, P. (2020). Proposal of a system for assessment of the sustainability of municipalities (sasmu) included in the Spanish network of national parks and their surroundings. Geosciences, 10(8), 298-324. doi: 10.3390/geosciences10080298
Namdar, R., & Sadighi, H. (2013). Investigation of major challenges of rural development in Iran utilizing Delphi technique.‏ Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology. 15(2013), 445-455, https://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-7317-en
Nasiri, A., & Tavakkoli, J. (2020). Assessing the role of mining in ghorveh county on the sustainability of surrounding villages. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 10(3), 1-15. doi: 10.22126/GES. 2020.5621.2281 (In Persian).
Ni, G., Liu, X., & Li, Q. (2014). Study of the objective weighting method based on data information in land resource evaluation. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 30(20): 255-262. doi: 10.3390/land12061173
Ostad-Ali-Askar; Su, K. R., & Liu, L. (2018). Water resources and climate change. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 9(2), 239. doi:10.2166/wcc.2018.999
Pirnazar, M., Hasheminasab, H., Karimi, A.Z. (2018). The evaluation of the usage of the fuzzy algorithms in increasing the accuracy of the extracted land use maps Elham Mohri-Esfahani. Int. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 17(4). 307-321. doi: 10.1504/ IJGENVI.2018.095063
Pourtaheri, M., Eftekhari, A. R., & Abbasi, M. (2013). Evaluating the Performance of the Rural Guide Plans in Physical Development of the Rural Settlements (Case Study: Nabovat and Khoran Villages in Eyvangharb Township). Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 2(4), 25-36.‏ https://ges.razi.ac. ir/article_198.html (In Persian).
Pugliese, P. (2001). Organic Farming and Sustainable Rural Development: A Multifaceted and Promising Convergence. Sociologia Ruralis. 41(1), 112-130. doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.0017.
Qiao, L. (2019). Village type identification and rural revitalization strategy: a case study of Zhangzi county of Shanxi province. Geography Program. 38(09), 1340-1348, doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz. 2019.09.007
Shen, J., Wang, Y. & Zhu, M. (2020). Evaluation index system and empirical analysis of rural revitalization level. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering., 36(3), 236-243. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.03.029
Shepherd, A. (1998). Sustainable rural development. Bloomsbury Publishing, 10.1007/978-1-349-26211-3.
Singh, K., & Shishodia, A. (2019). Rural development: Principles, policies, and management. SAGE Publishing India.‏ https://books.google.com/books
Sirajuddin, T. (2020). Rural development strategies in Indonesia: Managing villages to achieve sustainable development. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 447(1), 012066). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012066
Speight, K. C., Schiano, A. N., Harwood, W. S., & Drake, M. A. (2019). Consumer insights on prepackaged Cheddar cheese shreds using focus groups, conjoint analysis, and qualitative multivariate analysis. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(8), 6971-6986. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16209
Vaishar, A., & Šťastná, M. (2019). Smart Village and Sustainability. Southern Moravia Case Study. European Countryside, 11(4), 651-660. doi: 10.2478/euco-2019-0036
Wang, Y., Cheng, X., & Yin, P. (2013). Research on regional characteristics of China’s carbon emission performance based on entropy method and cluster analysis. Journal of Natural Resources, 28(7), 1106-1116. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.07.003
Wang, X., Liu, Z., & Chen, H. (2022). Investigating flood impact on crop production under a comprehensive and spatially explicit risk evaluation framework. Agriculture, 12(4), 484. doi: 10.3390/agriculture 12040484
Wang, G., Wang, M., Wang, J., & Yang, C. (2015). Spatio-temporal characteristics of rural economic development in eastern coastal china. Sustainability, 7(2), 1542-1557. doi: 10.3390/su7021542
Wen, Q., & Zheng, D. (2019). Identification and revitalization of rural poverty-stricken areas in northwest china. Geographical Research., 38(03), 509-521. doi: 10.3390/su11174547
Ye, X. (2018). The general principles of the china’s rural vitalization strategy in the new era. Reform, 1(10), 65-73. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10040125
Zhang, R., Jiang, G., & Zhang, Q. (2019) Does urbanization always lead to rural hollowing? Assessing the spatio-temporal variations in this relationship at the county level in China 2000–2015. Journal of Cleaner Production220, 9-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.148
Zavratnik, V., Kos, A., & Stojmenova Duh, E. (2018). Smart villages: Comprehensive review of initiatives and practices. Sustainability. 2018, 10, 2559. doi: 10.3390/su10072559
Zhou, Y., Guo, Y. & Liu, Y. (2019). Areal types and their development paths in rural China. Geographical Research, 38(03), 467-481. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
Zwolińska-Ligaj, M., Guzal-Dec, D., Adamowicz, M. (2018). The Concept of Smart Development of Local Territorial Units in Peripheral Rural Areas. The Case of Lublin Voivodeship. Wieś Roln, 2(179), 247–280. doi: 10.53098/wir022018/1