Land Cover Change Modeling Using a Hybrid Approach and Remote Sensing Data

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Nature Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran.

Abstract

Wetlands are vital for human survival and constitute 40.6% of the total value of global ecosystem services. This study analyzed land cover changes in the Golpayegan Shoor wetland from 1988 to 2018 and then modeled it with a combination of artificial neural network, Markov chain, and multi-objective optimization for 2030 and 2040 for obtaining environmental sustainability. To obtain the highest accuracy in transition potential modeling, four scenarios were used with various calibration periods and sub-models. The FOM index was used to evaluate the accuracy of various scenarios using the approach by overlaying three maps for the years 2008, actual 2018, and predicted 2018 maps. Effective variables in describing the changes occurred in the case study selected using Cramer's v. The highest accuracy was shown in a scenario with the calibration period of 1988-1998 and 9 sub-models in land cover change modeling 2018 year. The evidence likelihood of change map and distance from agricultural lands showed the highest impact in the changes of the study area. Residential areas and agricultural lands increased by 0.6% and 1.8% in 2030, while 1% and 2.2% grew up in 2040 compared to 2018, respectively. Dense rangeland decreased by 13.1% and 18.6%, respectively in 2030 and 2040 compared to 2018. The water bodies showed an increase of 0.18% and 0.27% due to the conversion of agricultural areas and rangeland to Lake Golpayegan and Kochery dams. Taking water from unauthorized wells, reducing the flow of water entering the wetland, and the presence of decorative ore has caused serious problems for Golpayegan Shoor Wetland, which requires managers and land planners to consider compensatory ways to restore, water requirement, and ecological sustainability for the wetland.
 
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
Wetlands are the most important biodiversity areas in the world. Their ecosystems are unique and productive where land and water habitats meet and have more biodiversity, nutrient recycling, and special ecological niches than other ecosystems. It provides multiple ecosystem services that support water security and provides benefits and values to society and the economy (Gleason et al., 2011). The value of coastal and inland wetland ecosystem services is usually higher than other types of ecosystems. The size of global wetlands is estimated from 5.3 to 12.8 million square kilometers. However, wetlands are declining rapidly, and researchers estimate that more than 50 percent of the world's wetlands have declined (Tiné et al., 2019). Monitoring the changes in wetlands during the past decades until now and identifying the direction of these changes is very necessary for managing and how to exploit wetlands and providing solutions that will prevent them from being included in the Monterey list (Karami and Mirsanjari, 2018). Golpayegan Shoor wetland has dried up since 30 years ago due to various reasons such as lack of attention to the environmental water requirement, excessive exploitation of underground water resources, reduction in the volume of the wetland aquifer, and drought (Aazami et al., 2018). Considering the environmental importance of the Golpayegan Shoor wetland and the land cover changes that have occurred in it, there is a need to formulate strategic plans for the land managers in order to achieve sustainable ecological development of the watershed and to prevent further destruction of these areas and the continuity of ecosystem services provided by the wetland is felt more than ever. Monitoring and modeling the land cover changes of Golpayegan Shoor wetland is necessary in order to achieve sustainable management of this wetland. The aim of the current research is to design and apply a computational model combining artificial neural network, Markov chain, and multi-purpose optimization in simulating the changes of Golpayegan Shoor wetland for 2030, and 2040 and evaluating the accuracy of artificial neural network in transition potential modeling.
 2-Materials and Methods
Landsat 5 sensor TM satellite images for 1988, 1998, and 2008 and Landsat 8 OLI sensor for 2018 were used to produce land cover maps. In the pre-processing stage, geometric and atmospheric correction was done. For geometric correction, topographic maps with a scale of 1:25000 and 20 ground control points were used to implement the polynomial equation. Dark-object subtraction method was used for atmospheric correction (Rodríguez Eraso et al., 2013). Training sites for six classes including agricultural lands, residential areas, water bodies, dense rangeland, semi-dense rangeland, and low-density rangeland (Farajzadeh et al., 2010) using field visits, false and real color composite images, and Google Earth were selected. Then, the maps were produced using the maximum likelihood classifier.
The current research was conducted using the Land Change Modeler (LCM). Analysis of changes in the study area was calculated using LCM for the studied time periods. These changes include the transition from one class to another, gain, loss, and net changes that indicate the difference between decrease and increase for each land cover class.
The present study integrates the approaches of artificial neural network, Markov chain, and multi-objective optimization into a single model. In the present study, the artificial neural network was used to model the transition potential maps. In the present research, the number of executions is considered to be 10,000 repetitions to achieve the highest accuracy. Accuracy rate and skill measures were also used to evaluate the neural network. We used the Markov chain model to estimate the amount of change that can occur in 2030 and 2040 based on previous land cover maps and the probability of change from one land cover class to another. A forecast map for 2018 was produced using the Markov chain model to evaluate the accuracy of the model (Islam et al., 2018).
Four scenarios were considered to achieve the highest accuracy in this study. In all scenarios, 9 sub-models that include the transition from one class to another type were selected for modeling. The difference between the scenarios is in the used calibration period and different sub-models. The calibration period of the first and second scenarios is 1988-1998 and the calibration period of the third and fourth scenarios is 1998-2008.
 
3- Results and Discussion
Residential areas (1355 ha), water bodies (660 ha), and agricultural lands (6557 ha) increased, and the dense rangeland (1354 ha), semi-dense rangeland (5429 ha) and Low-density rangeland (1790ha) also showed a decrease during 1988-2018. During these 30 years, agricultural areas (76 ha), semi-dense rangeland (324 ha), and dense rangeland (956 ha) were completely changed to residential areas. The amount of net change from dense rangeland, semi-dense rangeland, and low-density rangeland to agricultural land is 5417, 1201, and 287 ha, respectively. Also, agricultural lands, semi-dense rangeland, and dense rangeland showed a net change of 287, 311, and 61 ha to water bodies.
4- Conclusion
In the border area of Golpayegan Shoor wetland, parts of dense rangeland were converted to low-density and semi-dense rangeland, and also areas of dense rangeland were transferred to agricultural lands, which indicates the drying and destruction of the wetland. A decrease in the flow of water to the Golpayegan Shoor wetland has occurred, which is one of the reasons for the drying up of this wetland.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Aazami, J., Motevalli, A., Khosravi, Y., Hasani, A., Rajaei, M., & Sohrabi, H. (2018). Studies for estimating the water requirement of Golpayegan Shoor wetland. Isfahan General Department of Environmental Protection, Isfahan, 1–351. (In Persian).
Aazami, J., Motevalli, A., & Savabieasfahani, M. (2022). Evaluation of three environmental flow techniques in Shoor wetland of Golpayegan, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19 (8), 7885–7898. doi: 10.1007/s13762-022-03998-z.
Aghsaei, H., Dinan, N.M., Moridi, A., Asadolahi, Z., Delavar, M., Fohrer, N., & Wagner, P.D. (2020). Effects of dynamic land use/land cover change on water resources and sediment yield in the Anzali wetland catchment, Gilan, Iran. Science of the Total Environment712, 136449.  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136449.
Ajwang'Ondiek, R., Hayes, D. S., Kinyua, D. N., Kitaka, N., Lautsch, E., Mutuo, P., & Hein, T. (2021). Influence of land-use change and season on soil greenhouse gas emissions from a tropical wetland: A stepwise explorative assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 787, 147701. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147701.
Ansari, A., & Golabi, M.H. (2019). Prediction of spatial land use changes based on LCM in a GIS environment for Desert Wetlands–A case study: Meighan Wetland, Iran. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 7 (1), 64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.10.001.
Armenteras, D., Murcia, U., González, T.M., Barón, Ó.J., & Arias, J.E. (2019). Scenarios of land use and land cover change for NW Amazonia: Impact on forest intactness. Global Ecology and Conservation, 17, e00567. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00567.
Atkinson, P.M., & Tatnall, A.R. (1997). Introduction neural networks in remote sensing. International Journal of remote sensing, 18 (4), 699–709. doi: 10.1080/014311697218700.
Ayele, G., Hayicho, H., & Alemu, M. (2019). Land use land cover change detection and deforestation modeling: in Delomena District of Bale Zone, Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Protection, 10 (4), 532–561. doi: 10.4236/jep.2019.104031.
Azareh, A., Sardooi, E.R., Gholami, H., Mosavi, A., Shahdadi, A., & Barkhori, S. (2021). Detection and prediction of lake degradation using landscape metrics and remote sensing dataset. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 27283–27298. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12522-8.
Bakr, N., Weindorf, D.C., Bahnassy, M.H., Marei, S.M., & EL Badawi, M.M. (2010). Monitoring land cover changes in a newly reclaimed area of Egypt using multi-temporal Landsat data. Applied Geography, 30 (4), 592–605. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.008.
Beygi Heidarlou, H., Shafiei, A.B., Erfanian, M., Tayyebi, A., & Alijanpour, A. (2019). Effects of preservation policy on land use changes in Iranian Northern Zagros forests. Land use policy, 81, 76–90. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.036.
Birhane, E., Ashfare, H., Almaw Fenta, A., Hishe, H., Amha Gebremedhin, M., Wahed, H.G., & Solomon, N. (2019). Land use land cover changes along topographic gradients in Hugumburda national forest priority area, Northern Ethiopia. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 13, 61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2018.10.017.
Camacho Olmedo, M. T., Pontius Jr, R. G., Paegelow, M., & Mas, J. F. (2015). Comparison of simulation models in terms of quantity and allocation of land change. Environmental Modelling & Software, 69, 214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.003.
Chan, J. C., Chan, K. P., & Yeh, A. G. (2001). Detecting the nature of change in an urban environment: A comparison of machine learning algorithms. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67 (2), 213–225. doi: 0099-1112/01/6702-213$3.00/0.
Chen, H. & Pontius Jr, R.G. (2010). Diagnostic tools to evaluate a spatial land change projection along a gradient of an explanatory variable. Landscape Ecology, 25 (9), 1319–1331. doi: 10.1007/s10980-010-9519-5.
Eastman, J.R. (2020). TerrSet Geospatial Monitoring and Modeling System Manual. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, MA.
Eastman, J.R., Van Fossen, M.E., & Solarzano, L.A. (2005). Transition potential modeling for land cover change. GIS, Spatial Analysis and Modeling, 17, 357–386.
Farajzadeh, M., Fathnia, A., Alijani, B., & Ziaeian, P. (2010). Analysis of climatic thresholds for the growth of rangeland using remote sensing data (case study: Zagros). The Journal of Spatial Planning, 4 (3), 177–201. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-7005-8.
Foroughi, M., Aazami, J., & Khosravi. Y. (2021). Predicting future changes in temperature and precipitation using hadcm2 model (case study): Golpayegan Shoor Wetland, Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-06883-0.
Gingras, B., Slattery, S., Smith, K., & Darveau, M. (2017). Boreal wetlands of Canada and the United States of America. In: Finlayson, C.M., Milton, G.R., Prentice, R.C., Davidson, N.C. (Eds.), The Wetland Book. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1–23.
Gleason, R.A., Euliss Jr., N.H., Tangen, B.A., Laubhan, M.K., & Browne, B.A. (2011). USDA conservation program and practice effects on wetland ecosystem services in the Prairie Pothole Region. Ecological Applications, 21 (1), 65-81. doi: 10.1890/09-0216.1.
Gong, W., Yuan, L., Fan, W., & Stott, P. (2015). Analysis and simulation of land use spatial pattern in Harbin prefecture based on trajectories and cellular automata—Markov modelling. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 34, 207–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.07.005.
Gupta, R. & Sharma, L.K. (2020). Efficacy of Spatial Land Change Modeler as a forecasting indicator for anthropogenic change dynamics over five decades: A case study of Shoolpaneshwar Wildlife Sanctuary, Gujarat, India. Ecological Indicators, 112, 106171. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106171.
Islam, K., Rahman, M.F., & Jashimuddin, M. (2018). Modeling land use change using cellular automata and artificial neural network: The case of Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh. Ecological indicators, 88, 439–453. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.047.
Jafari, S., Hamzeh, S., Abdolazimi, H., & Attarchi, S. (2021). Two decades of monitoring Maharloo Wetland using satellite data provided in Google Earth Engine. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 30 (118), 153–168. (In Persian). doi: 10.22131/sepehr. 2021.246147.
Johnston, R., Cools, J., Liersch, S., Morardet, S., Murgue, C., Mahieu, M., Zsuffa, I., & Uyttendaele, G. (2013). WETwin: a structured approach to evaluating wetland management options in data-poor contexts. Environmental Science & Policy, 34 (1), 3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci. 2012.12.006.
Joorabian Shooshtari, S., Aazami, J., & Foroughi, M. (2022). Monitoring of Land Cover Changes using Land Change Modeler in Golpayegan Shoor Wetland (1972-2018). Journal of Environmental Sciences Studies, 7 (1), 4564–4579. doi: 10.22034/JESS.2022.143871 (In Persian).
Joorabian Shooshtari, S., & Gholamalifard, M. (2015). Scenario-based land cover change modeling and its implications for landscape pattern analysis in the Neka Watershed, Iran. Remote Sensing Application: Society and Environment, 1 (1), 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2015.05.001.
Joorabian Shooshtari, S., Shayesteh, K., Gholamalifard, M., Azari, M., & López-Moreno, J.I. (2021). Responses of surface water quality to future land cover and climate changes in the Neka River basin, Northern Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193 (7), 411. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09184-x.
Karami, P., & Mirsanjari, M. (2018). Analyzing the degradation of the landscape in the large Hawizeh wetland using remote sensing. Journal of Wetland Ecobiology, 10 (1), 39–54. http://jweb.ahvaz.iau.ir/article-1-657-fa.html. (In Persian).
Khoi, D.D., & Murayama, Y. (2010). Forecasting areas vulnerable to forest conversion in the tam Dao National Park region, Vietnam. Remote Sensing, 2 (5), 1249–1272. doi: 10.3390/ rs2051249.
Leta, M.K., Demissie, T.A., & Tränckner, J. (2021). Modeling and Prediction of Land Use Land Cover Change Dynamics Based on Land Change Modeler (LCM) in Nashe Watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Sustainability, 13 (7), 3740. doi: 10.3390/su13073740.
Maeda, E. E., de Almeida, C.M., de Carvalho Ximenes, A., Formaggio, A. R., Shimabukuro, Y. E., & Pellikka, P. (2011). Dynamic modeling of forest conversion: Simulation of past and future scenarios of rural activities expansion in the fringes of the Xingu National Park, Brazilian Amazon. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13 (3), 435–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2010.09.008.
Makrouni, S., Sabzghabaei, G.R., Yousefi Khanghah, S., & Soltanian, S. (2016). Detection of land use changes in Hoor Al Azim wetland using remote sensing and geographic information system techniques. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 7 (3), 89–99. https://girs.bushehr.iau.ir/article_526587.html. (In Persian).
Mas, J-F., Kolb, M., Paegelow, M., Camacho Olmedo, M.T., & Houet, T. (2014). Inductive pattern-based land use/cover change models: A comparison of four software packages. Environmental Modelling & Software, 51, 94–111. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.010.
Mirzaei, M., Jafari, A., Verrlest, J., Haghighi, M., Zargarnia, A.H., Khoshnoodmotlagh, S., Azadi, H., & Scheffran, J. (2020). Trans-boundary land cover changes and its influences on water crisis: Case study of the Aras River. Applied Geography, 124, 102323.  doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog. 2020.102323.
Mustapha, M.R., Lim, H.S., & Mat Jafri, M.Z. (2010). Comparison of Neural network and maximum likelihood approaches in image classification. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10 (22), 2847–2854. doi: 10.3923/jas.2010.2847.2854.
Naboureh, A., Rezaei Moghaddam, M.H., Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T. (2017). An integrated object-based image analysis and CA-Markov model approach for modeling land use/land cover trends in the Sarab plain. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s12517-017-3012-2.
Paegelow, M. (2018). LUCC based validation indices: figure of merit, producer’s accuracy and user’s accuracy. Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios, 433–436. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-60801-3_23
Pérez-Vega, A., Mas, J.F., & Ligmann-Zielinska, A. (2012). Comparing two approaches to land use/cover change modeling and their implications for the assessment of biodiversity loss in a deciduous tropical forest. Environmental Modeling & Software, 29 (1), 11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.011.
Pontius Jr., R.G. (2000). Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66 (8), 1011–1016. doi: 0099-1112/00/6608-1011$3.00.
Pontius Jr., R.G., Boersma, W., Castella, J.C., Clarke, K., Nijs, T., Dietzel, C., Duan, Z., Fotsing, E., Goldstein, N., Kok, K., Koome, E., Lippitt, C.D., McConnell, W., Sood, A.M., Pijanowski, B., Pithadia, S., Sweeney, S., Trung, T.N., Veldkamp, A.T., & Verburg, P.H. (2008). Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Annals of Regional Science, 42 (1), 11–37. doi: 10.1007/s00168-007-0138-2.
Pontius Jr., R.G., & Neeti, N. (2010). Uncertainty in the difference between maps of future land change scenarios. Sustainability Science, 5, 39–50. doi: 10.1007/s11625-009-0095-z.
Rodríguez Eraso, N., Armenteras-Pascual, D., & Retana Alumbreros, J. (2013). Land use and land cover change in the Colombian Andes: dynamics and future scenarios. Journal of Land Use Science, 8 (2), 154–174. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2011.650228.
Rozenstein, O., & Karnieli, A. (2011). Comparison of methods for land-use classification incorporating remote sensing and GIS inputs. Applied Geography, 31 (2), 533–544. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.11.006.
Rwanga, S. S., & Ndambuki, J.M. (2017). Accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classification using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Geosciences8 (04), 611. doi: 10.4236/ijg.2017.84033.
Schulz, J. J., Cayuela, L., Echeverria, C., Salas, J., & Rey Benayas, J. M. (2010). Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of Central Chile (1975–2008). Applied Geography, 30 (3), 436–447. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.12.003.
Shakeri, R., Shayesteh, K., & Ghorbani, M. (2019). Assessment and prediction of land use changes in the Anzali wetland Basin, Based on Land Change Modeler (LCM). Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 11 (2), 93–114. (In Persian). doi: 10.52547/gisj.11.2.93.
Shoyama, K. (2021). Assessment of land-use scenarios at a national scale using intensity analysis and figure of meritc. Land, 10 (4), 379. doi: 10.3390/land10040379.
Tiné, M., Perez, L., & Molowny-Horas, R. (2019). Hybrid spatiotemporal simulation of future changes in open wetlands: A study of the Abitibi-Témiscamingue region, Québec, Canada. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 74, 302–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2018.10.001.
Valizadeh, K., Sadeghi, M., & Hejazi, A. (2022). Modelling of forest change using LCM in the Fandoghlu forest area. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 52.4 (109), 127–140. doi: 10.22034/JCEE.2021.43502.1984.
Vaziri, S., & Izadinia, E. (2020). Investigation and modeling of two sequential dam failures under different scenarios (Case study Golpayegan and Kucherei dams). Iranian Water Research Journal, 14 (2), 159–172. https://iwrj.sku.ac.ir/article_10712.html?lang=fa. (In Persian).
Voight, C., Hernandez-Aguilar, K., Garcia, C., & Gutierrez, S. (2019). Predictive modeling of future forest cover change patterns in southern Belize. Remote Sensing, 11 (7), 823. doi: 10.3390/rs11070823.
Wang, W., Zhang, C., Allen, J. M., Li, W., Boyer, M. A., Segerson, K., & Silander Jr. J. A. (2016). Analysis and Prediction of Land Use Changes Related to Invasive Species and Major Driving Forces in the State of Connecticut. Land, 5 (3), 25. doi: 10.3390/land5030025.
Yousefi, S., Pourghasemi, H.R., Avand, M., Janizadeh, S., Tavangar, S., & Santosh, M. (2021). Assessment of land degradation using machine learning techniques: A case of declining rangelands. Land Degradation & Development32 (3), 1452–1466. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3794.
Zabihi, M., Moradi, H., Gholamalifard, M., Khaledi Darvishan, A., & Fürst, C. (2020). Landscape Management through Change Processes Monitoring in Iran. Sustainability, 12 (5), 1753. doi: 10.3390/su12051753.
Zedler, J. B., & Kercher, S. (2005). WETLAND RESOURCES: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 39–74. doi: 30.050504.144248.