Analyzing the Relationship between Participation of Local Communities and Sustainable Development of Ecotourism in Areas on Protection (Case Study: Lar National Park and Tangeh Vashi National Natural Monument)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Environmental Planning and Design, Environmental Sciences Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Environmental Planning and Design, Environmental Sciences Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In the current research, the level of sustainability in two different types of protected areas of Tehran province including Lar National Park and Tangeh Vashi National Natural Monument has been compared. In addition, the evaluation of the participation of local communities and ecotourists has been done in order to measure the impact of participation on the level of sustainability of ecotourism development in these areas. The present study is theoretical-practical in terms of its purpose, and descriptive-analytical and comparative in terms of its nature. The data was collected by documentary and survey method, in which the data was prepared according to previous studies, documents and international references by tourism organizations. Questionnaire, interview and observation tools were also used in the survey method. The analysis of data and information was done in a quantitative way, which used descriptive and inferential statistical tests and the ANP model for statistical analysis. The statistical population and sample size of the study include local communities and ecotourists. The validity of the research is based on structural and formal methods, and its reliability is calculated using Cronbach's alpha. The results of the network hierarchy analysis indicate that the highest points assigned to the effective variables in the sustainable development of ecotourism include biodiversity, ecosystem, monitoring-control and participation; And on the other hand, the lowest scores are related to the variables of access to ecotourism infrastructure and facilities, population density, number of plans and projects, and ecotourism costs. The results also indicated that the level of sustainability in Lar National Park is 4 (from 5), and in Vashi Gorge National Natural Park is 2.3. Also, the highest level of participation among local communities and ecotourists is related to Lar National Park.
 
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
In recent decades, Areas on Protection (APs)‎ ‎are considered as the most important ecotourism destinations and demand for sustainability development in these pristine and natural ecosystems is the most important challenge facing humanity in the 21st century. The rapid growth of urbanization and the increase in demand for ecotourism activities in natural ecosystems have led to a decrease in sustainability in APs and an increase in environmental threats and species extinction (Lee & Jan, 2019; Forje et al., 2020). Therefore, comparison of sustainability level of APs in ecotourism development is one of the most important solutions in planning process, and it is essential to consideration to it in policies and decisions. Lar National Park and Tangeh Vashi Natural Monument‎ have natural resources, landscapes, plant and animal diversity, and these genetically valuable reserves are the main basis for the growth and ecotourism development in APs‎. Unfortunately, in recent decades, due to various reasons, Lar and Tangeh Vashi have faced many changes, including increasing unsustainability. Hence, unsustainability impacts created in these areas have led to threat of plant and animal species, habitat fragmentation and reduction of biodiversity. Likewise, with ecotourism sustainable development in these areas, we can help continuation of their life and ecosystem. Due to the importance of this issue, in present research, the level of sustainability and participation of local communities and tourists in Lar National Park and Tangeh Vashi Natural Monument have been evaluated and compared.
 
2-Materials and Methods
The present study is theoretical-practical in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical and comparative in terms of nature. Data and information were collected by documentary method (according to previous studies, documents and international references from tourism organizations) and survey method (questionnaire, interview and observation). The analysis of data and information is quantitative and using descriptive-inferential statistical tests and ANP model. The statistical population and sample size include local communities and tourists. The validity of the research is based on structural and formal methods, and reliability is calculated using Cronbach's alpha.
 
3- Results and Discussion
The current study evaluated ‎sustainable ecotourism level in the studied areas, from local ‎communities ‎viewpoints. As the results revealed, among studied areas, ‎the ‎‎highest ‎ecotourism ‎sustainability‎ level is ‎related to‎ Lar, which one of the most important reasons affecting the issue ‎is legal ‎restrictions and prohibitions in national parks according to the IUCN instructions ‎‎(Majnonian, 2002).‎ Accordingly, the main goal of National parks ‎management is to minimize the impacts of human activities, such as development of ecotourism ‎‎activities (IUCN, 2008). Moreover, time to visit this area is limited to 6 June to end of ‎September ‎‎(during the year), ‎and also the entry of ecotourism requires license from the ‎Department of the ‎Environment ‎as the ‎custodian of these areas. Other reasons increasing sustainability‎ level in this ‎area, ‎include ‎high distance from human habitats, low level ‎of infrastructure and tourism ‎services, ‎high number of guard ‎stations and environmental ‎‎guardians, ‎high level of monitoring and control ‎on ecotourism ‎activities, ‎and access restrictions and development of ecotourism ‎due to high level ‎of slope and altitude.‎ ‎Likewise‎, the lowest ecotourism sustainability‎ level is allocated‎ Tangeh ‎Vash‎i, due to lack of ‎monitoring over the entry of visitors ‎‎to this area, especially on weekends and holidays. ‎Furthermore, lack of necessary tourism ‎‎infrastructures has led to decrease of sustainability, ‎increased habitat destruction, and extinction ‎‎of valuable species in this area. ‎Based on ‎the ‎‎‏conservation instructions in PAs of Iran, national ‎natural ‎‎monuments ‎have high ‎sensitivity and ‎low flexibility for the development of human ‎activities (Majnonian, 2002); so, ‎exploitation of these areas is prohibited, while in Tangeh ‎Vash‎i, ‎uncontrolled development of ‎human activities has been observed. Hence, the results demonstrate that, factors affecting ‎in ‎‎unsustainability ecotourism in this area, include the large number of tourists‎ and ‎visitors ‎due to ‎lack of sufficient monitoring, ‎and also existence of many historical, natural, ‎and ‎cultural ‎attractions. These findings have ‎been confirmed by other studies (Sobhani et al.,‎ 2021; Sayadi ‎& Moghadasi, 2011; Department ‎of the Environment of Iran, 2014). ‎The results of the impact of stakeholders' participation on ecotourism sustainability level, indicate that the highest level of participation among local communities and tourists, respectively, is related to Lar (with a mean of 3.9 and 3.5), and the lowest level of participation ( with a mean of 2.8 and 1.8) is allocated to Tangeh ‎Vash‎i. Among the reasons for this issue, we can mention the fact that most of local communities are indigenous, the high level of social capital among local communities, and the economic benefits of tourism attractions for local communities.
According to ‎‏conservation instructions in PAs of Iran, National parks, and Natural monuments ‎‎have high ecological ‎sensitivity and low flexibility for the development of human activities ‎‎(Majnonian‏ ‏‏‎2015). Accordingly, identifying and ‎the evaluating factors affecting in increase of ‎‎‎‎‎‎unsustainability in PAs (according to managerial goals in these areas), can help proper planning ‎and ‎development of sustainability ecotourism in these areas ‎‎(Haghverdi et al., 2018).‎
 
4- Conclusion
According to the IUCN ‎classification, various types of PAs have specific management ‎objectives, so achieving ‎multilateral goals ‎‎(educational, research, conservation, and recreational), ‎as well as protecting ‎them from human ‎activities requires development of sustainability, and ‎exploitation according to ‎the capabilities of ‎these areas. Accordingly, according to the different protection and management goals in APs, it is necessary that ecotourism activities development within the framework of sustainability and existing legal mechanisms in these areas, this means that demands of tourists should be met in relation to protect these valuable biological reserves.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Agyeiwaah, E., Mckercher, B., & Suntikul, W. (2017). Identifying core indicators of sustainable tourism: A path forward? Tourism ‎Management Perspectives, 24, 26-33. ‎
Alcon, F., Albaladejo-Garcia, J. A., Zabala, J. A., & Marin-Minano, C. (2019). Understanding social demand for sustainable nature ‎conservation. The case of a protected natural space in South-Eastern Spain. Journal for Nature Conservation, 51, 125722. ‎
Ashok, S., Tewari, H. R., Behera, M. D., & Majumdar, A. (2017). Development of ecotourism sustainability assessment framework ‎employing Delphi, C&I and participatory methods: A case study of KBR. West Sikkim, India. Tourism Management Perspectives, ‎‎21, 24-41. ‎
Asian Development Bank. (2014). Regional state of the Coral Triangle marine resources: Their status, economies, and management of the Coral Triangle, Retrieved from: http:// www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/42393/regional-statecoral-triangle.
‎Asmelash, A. G., & Kumar, S. (‎‎2018). ‎Assessing progress of tourism sustainability: Developing and validating sustainability indicators. Tourism Management, 71, 67-83.
Bersola-Avelino, J. H., Sasaki, J., & Esteban, M. (2019). Valenzuela, V. P. 2019. Sustainability Evaluation of Marine Protected Areas ‎Index (SEMPAI): A multi-criteria decision-making method to determine the effectiveness of the El Nido-Taytay Managed Resource ‎Protected Area. Ocean & Coastal Management, 181, 104891. ‎
Blancas, F. G., & Lozano-‎Oyola, M. (2022). Sustainable tourism evaluation using a composite indicator with different compensatory levels. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93, 106733.
Blancas, F. J., Lozano-Oyola, M., & González, M. (2015). A European Sustainable Tourism Labels proposal using a composite indicator. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev, 54, 39-54.
Buckley, R. (2004). Environmental Impacts of Ecotourism. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. ‎
Castellani, V., & Sala, S. (2010). Sustainable performance index for tourism policy development. Tourism Management, 31, 871-880.
Cerveny, L. K. (‎‎2022). Sustainable recreation and tourism: Making sense of diverse conceptualizations and management paradigms. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 38, 100520.
Chung, S. H., Lee, A. H. L., & Pearn, W. L. (2005). Analytic Network Process ‎‎(ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. ‎International Journal of Production Economics, 96, 15-36.‎
Department of Environment of Tehran. (2019). Reports of PAs of Tehran province (In Persian).‎
Department of the Environment of Iran. (2003). Environmental Management Plan of Lar National Park. ‎‎Office of Habitats and Regional Affairs (In Persian).‎
Department of the Environment of Iran. (2012). Lar National Park Environmental Management Plan ‎‎‎(review plan). Office of Habitats and Regional Affairs. Development pardazan ideh Consulting ‎‎Engineers (In Persian).‎
Department of the Environment of Iran. (2014). Management Plan of TangehVashi National Natural Monument. Office of Habitat and Regional Affairs. University of Shahid Beheshti (In Persian). ‎
Ervin, J., Sekhran, N., Gidda, S., Vergeichik, M., & Mee, J. (2010). Protected areas for the 21st century: Lessons from UNDP/GEF’s ‎portfolio. UNDP. New York, USA. ‎
European Commission. (2013). The European tourism indicator system. Toolkit for Sustainable Destinations. Luxembourg, European Union.
Forje, G.W., Tchamba, M. N., & Eno-Nku, M. (2020). Determinants of ecotourism development in ‎and around protected areas: The case of Campo Ma'an National Park in Cameroon. Scientific ‎African, 11, e00663. ‎
Global Footprint Network, National footprint accounts. (2015). Retrieved from: http://www. footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/licenses1/. (Accessed 10.08.16).
Haghverdi, F., Jahani, A., Zebardast, L., Makhdom, M., & Goshtasb, H. (2018). Quantification of wildlife habitat disintegration using landscape ecology approach (case study: Lar National Park and Vargin PA). Journal of Animal Envirnoment, 10, 23–34 (In Persian).
Huang, Y., & Coelho, V. R. (2017). Sustainability performance assessment focusing on coral reef protection by the tourism industry in the Coral Triangle Region. Tourism Manage, 59, 510-527.
Iran Statistics Center. (2016). The results of the general population and housing census. Tehran (In Persian).
IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas. (2008). Establishing Resilient Marine Protected Area ‎Networks — Making it Happen. ‎
La Page, W. (2010). Rethinking Park Protection: Treading the Uncommon Ground of Environmental Beliefs. CABI, Wallingford. ‎
Lee, T. H., & Hsieh, P. H. (2016). Indicators of sustainable tourism: A case study from a Taiwan’s wetland. Ecological Indicators, 67 ,779-787.
Lee, T. H., & Jan, F. H. (2019). Can community-based tourism contribute to sustainable development? ‎Evidence from residents’ perceptions of the sustainability. Tourism Management, 70, 368–380. ‎
Lee, T. H., Jan, F. H., & Liu, J. T. (2021). Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: Evidence from a ‎Taiwan ecological resort. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107596. ‎
Lozano-Oyola, M., Blancas, F. J., Gonzalez, M., & Caballero, R. (2012). Sustainable tourism indicators as planning tools in cultural destinations. Ecological Indicators‎, 18, 659-675.
Majnonian, H., (2002). ‎Instructions for preparing of management plan in PAs. Publications of the ‎Management and Planning Organization. ‎
Majnounian, H. (2012). Guidelines of National parks planning (Practical basics of planning process and preparation of national parks management plan- FAO 1989). Tehran: Publication of department of the environment of Iran (In Persian).
Majnounian, H. (2014). Protected areas of Iran (fundamentals and protection measures of parks and areas in Iran and the world). Tehran: Dey nagar press (In Persian).
Mallick, S. K., Rudra, S., & Samanta, R. (2020). Sustainable ecotourism development using SWOT and QSPM approach: A study on ‎Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 8 (3), 185-193. ‎
Mascarenhas, A., Nunes, L. M., & Ramos, T. B. (2015). Selection of sustainability indicators for planning: combining stakeholders’ participation and data reduction techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 295-307.
Moharram Nejad, N, & Noorbakhsh, S. Z. (2015). Elaboration of sustainable ecotourism management in area of the national natural monument of dry land using AHP and SWOT methods. Environmental Sciences and Technology Quarterly, 18 (2), 317-326 (In Persian).
Najafi, A. (2010). Structure and environmental challenges analysis in projects ‎management using analytical. International Journal of Industry and ‎Production Management Engineering, 1 (21), 63-76. (In Persian).
Nesticò, A., & Maselli, G. (‎‎2019). Sustainability indicators for the economic evaluation of tourism investments on islands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119217.
Núñez-Lara, E., Beltrán-Ramírez, V. H., Laffon-Leal, S. M., & Martínez-Fernández, C. N. (2022). An indicator-based evaluation of sustainability in a coastal region of southern Mexico transitioning from traditional activities to tourism. Environmental Development, 42, 100700.
Ocampo, L., Ebisa, J. A., Ombe, J., & Escoto, M. J. (2018). Sustainable ecotourism indicators with fuzzy ‎Delphi method – A Philippine perspective. Ecological indicators, 93, 874-888.
Parvesh, H., & Beirami Bastam, L. (2019). Providing and prioritizing sustainable tourism solutions in Geno protected areas. Geography of tourism space, 9 (36), 38-54 (In Persian).
Pour Ahmad, A., Behdoost, F., & Farhoudi, R. (2014). Investigating the role of tourism in the urban development of Kermanshah. Geography and urban-regional planning, 5 (15), 85-100 (In Persian).
Reihanian, A., Mahmodi, N., Kahrom, E., & Hin, T. (2012). Sustainable tourism development strategy by SWOT analysis: Boujagh ‎National Park, Iran. Tourism Management Perspectives, 4, 223-228. ‎
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, planning priority. ‎Resource Allocation. RWS Publication, USA. 287 pp.‎
Saberi, A., Salehi Karunian, A., & Salehi Karunian, Z. (2013). Ecotourism potentials and capabilities of environmentally protected areas in the direction of sustainable development (case study: protected region of Gorgan Worldview). Tourism Management Studies Quarterly, 12, 70-86 (In Persian).
Sayadi, F., & Moghaddasi, R. (2019). Economic valuation of environmental friendliness (case study: Tngeh Vashi and Savashi Waterfall tourism region in Firuzkoh township). Journal of Renewable Natural Resources Research, 2 (3), 34-43 (In Persian).
Schianetz, K., & Kavanagh, L. (2008). Sustainability indicators for tourism destinations: a complex adaptive systems approach using systemic indicator systems. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16 (6), 601-628.
Sobhani, P., Esmaeilzadeh, H., & Mostafavi, H. (2021). Simulation and impact assessment of future land ‎use and land cover changes in ‎two protected areas in Tehran, Iran. Sust. Cities Soc, 75, 1–‎‎11. ‎ ‎
Sobhani, P., Goshtasb, H., Nezami, B., & Jahani, A. (2018). Evaluation of promoting potential of conservation hunting areas (case study: Hamedan Alvand No-Hunting Area. J. Env. Sci. Tech, 20, 145–159 (In Persian).
Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., & Therrien, M. C. (2013). Sustainable tourism indicators: selection criteria for policy implementation and scientific recognition. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21 (6), 862-879.
Torres-Delgado, A., & Palomeque, F. L. (2014). Measuring sustainable tourism at the municipal level. Ann. Tourism Res, 49, 13–122.
Tseng, M. L., Lin, Ch., Lin., Ch. W. R., Wu, K. J., & Sriphon, T. (2019). Ecotourism development in ‎Thailand: Community participation leads to the value of attractions using linguistic preferences. ‎Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1319-1329.‎
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2005). Making tourism more sustainable: A guide for policy makers. Madrid: United Nations Environment Programme, Division of Technology. Industry and Economics, World Tourism Organization.
United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). (2004). Compendium of tourism statistics, Data 2008–2012. Spain: UNWTO.
United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). (2018). Compendium of tourism statistics, Data 2014–2018. Spain: ‎UNWTO.
Wang, S. H., Lee, M. T., Château, P. A., & Chang, Y. C. (2016). Performance indicator framework for evaluation of sustainable tourism in the Taiwan Coastal Zone. Sustainability, 8 (7), 652.
Wondirad, A., & Ewnetu, B. (2019). Community participation in tourism development as a tool to foster sustainable land and resource use practices in a national park milieu. Land Use Policy, 88 (1),1-13.
World Bank, Indicators. (2015). Retrieved from: http://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/ (Accessed 10.08.17).
World Tourism Organization. (2004). Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations: A Guidebook. United Nations World Tourism Organization, Madrid, Spain.
Yuksel, I., & Dagdeviren, M. (2007). Using the analytic network process ‎‎(ANP) in a SWOT analysis-a case study for a textile firm. Information ‎Sciences, 177, 3364- 3382. ‎
Zhang, H. Q., Fan, D. X. F., Tse, T. S. M., & King, B. (2017). Creating a scale for assessing socially sustainable tourism. J. Sustainable Tourism, 25 (1), 61–78.
Zhang, X., Zhong, L., & Yu, H. (2022). Sustainability assessment of tourism in protected areas: A relational perspective. Global Ecology and Conservation, 35, e02074.