The Analysis of Translocality Knowledge Network: Introducing a New Approach to Human Geography Research

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In recent years, the levels of spatial analysis in human geography have undergone new changes and the concept of translocal relations and studies has emerged and become increasingly popular as relationships that a settlement or a local community establishes with higher spatial levels (regional, regional, national and international). However, the analysis of the knowledge network (co-authorship and co-occurrence words) of translocality has been neglected, despite its necessity and its role in the development of rural geography research, which is examined for the first time in this study. Systematic analysis of the translocality knowledge network and its mapping can identify its sources, trends and shortcomings. In this regard, the data were collected and refined from the Scopus information database and was analyzed with algorithms based on social network analysis in VOSviewer software. The findings showed that of more than 1135 scientific documents and 1364 authors, the United States, United Kingdom and Germany had the most publications, and authors like Sakdapolrak, Steinbrink, Greiner and Sterly had the highest citations. Sakdapolrak cluster of ideas had the highest network density. Asian countries were at the bottom of the list. Co-occurrence analysis of words revealed five research clusters in translocality studies related to the connections and flows of people, capital, goods, information, technologies and innovations. Applying the knowledge network analysis approach and mapping it is recommended to achieve a holistic perspective in the field of human geography research and in the future.
 
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
The pattern of distribution of activities and spatial flows has always been considered on a certain scale. That is while the spatial arrangement of activities is the main determinant of population movement, capital, goods and services, which the development of the area, urban and rural nodes and their communication network ultimately affects, and determines the quality of regional development. Considering that the levels of spatial arrangement of activities in most cases are local, regional, national and international, the missing link in the study of geographical spaces can be proportionally searched at the translocal level. Translocality includes the relationships that a settlement or a local community establishes with higher spatial levels (regional, regional, national, and international) in different areas. A network of key actors or actors in geographical spaces seeks to reconstruct relationships between different scales and to define or create new performance scales that can be manifested under translocal relationships.
In recent years, the levels of spatial analysis in human geography have undergone new changes and the concept of translocal relations and studies has emerged and become popular as the relationship that a settlement or a local community establishes with higher spatial levels (regional, regional, national and international). However, the analysis of the knowledge network (co-authorship and co-occurrence words) of translocality, has been neglected, despite its necessity and its role in the development of rural geography research, which is examined for the first time in this study. Systematic analysis of the translocality knowledge network and its mapping can identify its sources, trends and shortcomings.
 
2-Materials and Methods
This research is applied in terms of type that has used scientometric approach to review scientific documents. The present study is a type of scientometrics. In this research, the method of social network analysis with an exploratory approach has been used to explain and analyze the homogeneity and co-authorship of related research in the whole network. In this regard, the data were collected and refined from the Scopus information database and was analyzed with algorithms based on social network analysis in VOSviewer software.
Thus, by Census method, the metadata of all scientific documents (including articles and books) related to the field of translocality in English inserted in the title, abstract and keywords of Scopus database from 1983 to the end of March 2022 were checked in several rounds, and the irrelevant words were removed or refined. The VOSviewer software is a network analysis-based application that can be used to draw scientific networks and scientometric-based studies. The software has many applications in research based on research literature and research background.
 
3- Results and Discussion
The findings showed that of more than 1135 scientific documents and 1364 authors, the United States, United Kingdom and Germany had the most publications, and authors like Sakdapolrak, Steinbrink, Greiner and Sterly had the highest citations. Sakdapolrak cluster of ideas had the highest network density. Asian countries were at the bottom of the list. Co-occurrence analysis of words revealed five research clusters in translocality studies related to the connections and flows of people, capital, goods, information, technologies and innovations.
In general, the growth trend of scientific documents related to translocality in the last forty years has experienced three stages of initial research, rapid development and a relatively stable stage.Also, the findings of this study showed that in human geography research, translocality has been viewed from different dimensions and in diverse and related ecosystems in such a way that it covers different levels from micro to international scale and urban to rural spaces.
 
4- Conclusion
The study and analysis of new research networks such as translocality as an epistemological development in human geography and spatial planning reveals the paradigm trends and shifts of knowledge in this field and shows the research advances in translocality.
Applying the knowledge network analysis approach and mapping it is recommended to achieve a holistic perspective in the field of human geography research and in the future.
Finally, the translocality knowledge map extracted in this research can be used by researchers to achieve a holistic and integrated view in Land use planning studies, Islamic-Iranian model of progress, writing city development documents, etc. in order for development policies to be linked with realities of translocal relations, and to achieve sustainable development for Iran by reducing inequalities due to unconventional translocal flows and links.

Keywords


Afrakhteh, H. (2012). Space Economics and Rural Development (Case: Shaft Area). Space Economy and Rural Development., 1 (1), 39-54 (In Persian).
Aghasizadeh, F., & Gholami – Conclusion, S. (2019). Seventy Years of Development Planning in Iran: Injuries and Challenges, Publications of the Center for Development and Futurism Research. First Edition (In Persian).
Alipour-Hafezi, M., Ramezani, H., Momeni, E. (2018). Knowledge map of digital libraries in Iran: a co-word analysis. Iranian Journal of Information processing and Management.33 (2), 453-488 (In Persian).
Annamoradnejad, R., & Rahim., B. (2016). Meta-analysis of the scientific articles in Iranian Geographical during 2009- 2013 (Case Study: Journals of Geography and Development, Geographical Research, geographical space). Spatial Planning, 6 (3), 59-78 (In Persian).
Azarbad, N.. (2013). New methods of zoning in geographical spaces. Journal of Regional Planning, 3 (12), 93-102 (In Persian).
Babalhavaeji, F., Zarei, A., Neshat, N., & Hariri, N. (2014). Mapping of Knowledge and Information Science based on Main and Sub-main Subject Categorization. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 6 (13), 1-24 (In Persian).
Badamchi, M. (2022). Planning without theory; The Unheard Voice of the Collapse of Technocratic Planning in Iran. Public Policy, 8 (1), 9-10 (In Persian).
Badri, S. A., Rezvani, M., & Khodadadi, P. (2019). Analyzing the Qualitative Content of Spatial Policies of Rural Development in Iran’s Post Islamic Revolution. Spatial Planning, 9 (1), 1-24 (In Persian).
Brickell, K., & Datta, A. (2011a). Introduction: translocal geographies. In: Brickell, K. and Datta, A. (eds) Translocal geographies: spaces, places, connections. Farnham: Ashgate, 3-20.
Brickell, K., & Datta, A. (eds) (2011b). Translocal geographies. Spaces, places, connections. Farnham: Ashgate.
Castree, N. (2004). Differential geographies: place, indigenous rights and ‘ local’ resources. Political Geography. 23, 133-167.
Conradson, D., & McKay, D. (2007). Translocal subjectivities: mobility, connection, emotion. Mobilities 2 (2), 167-174.
Cowan, R., (2005),The Dictionary of Urbanism, Norfolk.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of journal of business research: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 1-14.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The Faseb journal, 22 (2), 338-342.‏
Fanni, Z. (2013). Space, Scale and Globalization: Analysis of the Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Strategic Studies of public policy, 4 (12), 93-106 (In Persian).
Featherstone, D. (2011). On assemblage and articulation. Area, 43 (2), 139-142.
Greiner, C., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). Translocality: Concepts, applications and emerging research perspectives. Geography compass, 7 (5), 373-384.
Greiner, C., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2016). Migration, environment and inequality: Perspectives of a political ecology of translocal relations. In Environmental migration and social inequality (pp. 151-163). Springer, Cham.‏
Hedberg, C., & do Carmo, R. M. (eds) (2012). Translocal ruralism: mobility and connectivity in European rural spaces. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kavianirad, M. (2015). A New Approach to Redefinition of Political Geography. Human Geography Research, 47 (3), 543-556 (In Persian).
Lange, B., & Büttner K. (2010). Spatialization patterns of translocal knowledge networks: conceptual understandings and empirical evidences of Erlangen and Frankfurt/Oder. European Planning Studies 18 (6), 989-1018.
Long, N. (2008). Translocal livelihoods, networks of family and community, and remittances in Central Peru. In: IOM and SSRC (eds) Geneva, New York: International Organization for Migration and Social Science Research Council, 37-68.
Ma, E. K.-w. (2002). Translocal spatiality. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 5, 131–152.
Mansourian, H., Rezvani, M., & Saadi, S. (2017). Spatial Analysis of Rural Floating Population Employed in Urban Areas. Journal of Rural Research, 8 (4), 621-634 (In Persian).
Massey, D. (1999). Power-geometries and the politics of space and time. Hettner Lecture 1998, Department of Geography, University of Heidelberg.
Navidi, F, Mirtaheri, S. L., Hassanzadeh, M. (2017). Data Analysis Methods in Social Networks. Human Information Interaction., 4 (2), 58-70 (In Persian).
Porst, L., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2018). Advancing adaptation or producing precarity? The role of rural-urban migration and translocal embeddedness in navigating household resilience in Thailand. Geoforum, 97, 35-45.‏
Rau, H. (2012). The ties that bind? Spatial (immobilities) and the transformation of rural–urban Connections. In: Hedberg, C. and Do Carmo, M. R. (eds) Translocal ruralism mobility and connectivity in European rural spaces. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 35-55.
Reetz, D. (2010). ‘Alternate’ globalities? On the cultures and formats of transnational Muslim networks from South Asia. In: Freitag, U. and Von Oppen, A. (eds) Translocality: the study of globalising processes from a Southern Perspective. Leiden: Brill, 293-334.
Rockenbauch, T., Sakdapolrak, P., & Sterly, H. (2019). Do translocal networks matter for agricultural innovation? A case study on advice sharing in small-scale farming communities in Northeast Thailand. Agriculture and Human Values, 36 (4), 685-702.‏
Sadeghi, M., Javan, J., Rahnama, M. R. (2015). “What is The geographical space?” A thinking on the nature of the geographical space from the perspective of hermeneutic phenomenology. Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 5 (19), 12-28 (In Persian).
Saeedi, A. (2017). Editor's note. Geography, 15 (New Era) (52), (In Persian).
Saeedi, A. (2018). Scientific critique and "critique" of structural-functional dynamics. Geography, 16 (58), 5-20‏ (In Persian).
Saidi, A, Azizpour, F., Hosseini Hassel, S., Khalifeh, E., & Rika, J. (2012). Comparative study of barriers to the formation of rural-urban links Case: Marvdasht (Fars) and Kuhdasht (Lorestan). Geography, 10 (33), 7-26 (In Persian).
Sakdapolrak, P., Naruchaikusol, S., Ober, K., Peth, S., Porst, L., Rockenbauch, T., & Tolo, V. (2016). Migration in a changing climate. Towards a translocal social resilience approach. DIE ERDE–Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin, 147 (2), 81-94.‏
Steinbrink, M. (2009). Leben zwischen Stadt und Land. Migration, Translokalität und Verwundbarkeit in Südafrika. Wiesbaden:VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Taleshi, M., Khodapanah, K., & Aghayari Hir, M. (2018). Analysis of Spatial-Functional Links of Tourism Centers, Case Study:-Ardebil District. Geography (Regional Planning), 8 (3), 195-205 (In Persian).
Van Eck N. J., & Waltman L. (2018) VOSviewer manual.
Verne, J. (2012). Living translocality. Space, culture and economy in contemporary Swahili trade. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global networks, 2 (4), 301-334.
Zoomers, A., & Westen, G. V. (2011). Introduction: translocal development, development corridors and development chains. International Development Planning Review, 33(4), 377-388.