Evaluation and Comparison of Resource sustainability of Two Forest Reserves in Hamadan Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Nature Engineering, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran

Abstract

In recent years, forest control and management in accordance with biodiversity and economic and social issues and its relationship with sustainable development has received a lot of attention. The present study aims to evaluate and compare the resource stability of two forest reserves in the valley of Somaqh   and Baneh Aznavaleh Malayer in Hamadan province. In this study, a combined method, including multi-criteria AHP evaluation method and sustainability indicators the guidelines of the 505th issue of the Forests and Rangelands Organization have been used to determine and prioritize indicators of sustainable forest management at the local level. Biodiversity, with the lowest score in both reserves including legal measures and organizational structure, economic and social functions, forest production functions, forest resources, conservation functions with the lowest score have the greatest impact on the instability of two forest reserves respectively. Somaqh Valley forest reserve with a final weight of 0.571 compared to Baneh Aznavleh forest reserve with a final weight of 0.428 has more relative stability which is due to better biodiversity and species richness. So that the Somaqh Valley Reserve with a score of 51 has moderate stability and Aznavaleh, 31 points, is in a state of instability. Biodiversity, health and well-being, conservation functions, economic and social functions of Somaqh forest reserve has better sustainability which is due to the greater differences and advantages of indicators of forest resources. Indicators show the importance of local participation in the sustainable management of both reserves. So that the lack of social acceptance is one of the most important reasons for the failure of forest rehabilitation plans and programs. The combination of AHP model technique and forest sustainability assessment indicators can be an appropriate tool for sustainable forest management.
 
Keywords: Biodiversity, Sustainable Forest Development, Somaqh Valley, Baneh  Aznavaleh
Introduction
The concept of sustainable forest management has three basic elements including economic, social and ecological sustainability, which has received much attention regarding biodiversity and economic and social issues and its relationship with sustainable development in recent years. Some criteria have been proposed to assess forest sustainability in which biodiversity is considered as one of the important criteria. Nowadays, the recognition of indicators is recognized as a tool to assess forest sustainability by planners and decision makers. Recent studies show that existing benchmarks and indicators are applicable nationally and internationally which can rarely be applied locally. In fact, these national indicators and criteria must be adjusted to make the right decision at the local level to be usable. Therefore, distances and uncertainties should be evaluated in order to determine local criteria and indicators, so that they can be used in relation to forest sustainability assessment at the local scale. These criteria and indicators should include all stakeholders with different economic and social demands and needs and be effective, useful and efficient in sustainable forest management decisions.  The present study aims to evaluate and compare the resource sustainability of two forest reserves Somaqh vally and Baneh Aznavaleh Malayer in Hamadan using a combined method to determine and prioritize sustainable forest management indicators at the local level using AHP multi-criteria evaluation method and indicators. Sustainability is the guideline of the 505th publication of the Forests and Rangelands Organization of the country.
 
Materials and Methods
In this study, a combined approach including AHP hierarchical analysis process method and guidelines of 505 Journal of Rangeland Forests Organization has been used to determine and prioritize criteria and indicators of sustainability at the local level forest reserves of Baneh Aznavaleh and Somaqh vally of Malayer in Hamadan. At first, the viewpoints of the two main groups, including local stakeholders and the second group of academics and research centers were applied to determine local criteria and indicators. Since the views of local stakeholders do not express all the challenges of sustainable management of the two repositories, we have used the second group to complete the process of determining and prioritizing the criteria. Then, the weight and absolute weight are calculated based on AHP method. In the next step, the forest stability score is calculated and compared with the absolute weight according to the instructions of the 505th publication of the Forests and Rangelands Organization. The stability of the two reserves has been evaluated.
 
 Results and Discussion
The evaluation of the criteria showed that the prioritization of the criteria based on weight, from the highest to the lowest, includes biodiversity, socio-economic issues, production roles, health and survival, legal frameworks, erosion, quality and extent, respectively. The role and impact of biodiversity with the highest weight is the most important indicator in the sustainability of both reserves. In general, the study of relative weights for each reserve, total relative weights, final weight of each reserves in terms of sustainability showed the Somaqh forest reserve are more preferred than Aznavaleh reserve in terms of biodiversity, socio-economic criteria, legal frameworks, policies Organizational, production roles and quality .The results show that the Somaqh Valley deposit with a final weight of 0.71479764 is in a better condition in terms of stability than the Baneh Aznavaleh reserves with a final weight of 0.480654343. The results of total relative weights show that after biodiversity, economic and social functions, forest production functions, forest resources range, and conservation functions have the greatest impact on the instability of both forest reserves, respectively.
 
Conclusion
Studies show that the final score of stability of Somaqh forest is 51 and Baneh Aznavaleh forest is 31, which based on the qualitative determination of sustainability indicates the existence of instability in Aznavaleh reserve and moderate stability in Somaqh valley. Surveys show that the importance of biodiversity is very important in forest sustainability leading to instability due to low scores in both reserves. Field observations show that biodiversity, health and vitality, extent and production functions and conservation are the most important indicators that are relatively better in the Somaqh forest. However, studies show that the forests of the region are not able to produce industrial wood due to special ecological conditions. Their main function is a supportive and protective role. These indicators show the importance of local people in the sustainable management of both reserves. The lack of social acceptance is one of the most important reasons for the failure of plans and programs for sustainable forest restoration and development.

Keywords

Main Subjects


الهی، محسن؛ اکبری­نیا، مسلم (1393). ارزیابی پایداری سه ذخیره­گاه جنگلی سمیرم اصفهان. اکوسیستم­های طبیعی ایران، 5 (1)، 49-63.
ایمانی رستابی­، مجتبی؛ جلیلوند­، حمید؛ زندبصیری­، مهدی (1394). ارزیابی نمایه­ها و نشانه­های اجتماعی - اقتصادی در پایش طرح جنگلداری کلگچی لردگان­. مجلّة تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران­، 23­ (2)، 199-208­.
جلیلوند، حمید­؛ کرمی، امید؛ شاه نظری، آناهیتا؛ شعبانی، مرتضی (1391). ارزیابی تفرّجی به­کمک فرایند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی (AHP) و سامانة اطّلاعات جغرافیایی (GIS) مطالعة موردی: پارک جنگلی شهید زارع، مازندران. جغرافیا و توسعه، ­­10 (29)، 107-118.
دستورالعمل پایش و ارزشیابی طرح­های مدیریت منابع طبیعی و آبخیزداری، ایران. ریاست جمهوری. معاونت برنامه­ریزی و نظارت راهبردی، دفتر نظام فنی و اجرایی، سازمان جنگل­ها، مراتع و آبخیزداری، دفتر طرح­ریزی و هماهنگی (1388). انتشارات معاونت برنامه­ریزی و نظارت راهبردی رئیس­جمهور، 505، 130-182.
زند بصیری، مهدی؛ پروین، طیبه (­1391). بررسی اهمّیت معیارها و شاخص­های فرایند خاور نزدیک در مدیریت پایدار جنگل­های زاگرس (مطالعة موردی: حوضة آبخیز تنگ سولک استان کهگیلویه و بویراحمد). نشریة تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران، 20 (2)، 204-216.
صادقی کاجی­، حمداله؛ جعفری­، علی؛ یارعلی­، نبی­اله (1394). ارزیابی مدیریت پایدار جنگل در حوضة آبخیز دوپلان استان چهارمحال و بختیاری. نشریة تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران­، 23 (3)، 490-501.
صدیق­کوهی­، مریم؛ رستمی شاهراجی، تیمور؛ ­محمدی لیمایی­، سلیمان ­(­1391­). کاربرد برنامه­ریزی هدف در مدیریت پایدار جنگل (مطالعة موردی: سری 11­ حوزة شفارود)، پایان­نامة کارشناسی ارشد جنگلداری، دانشگاه گیلان.
گلیج، ایوب؛ حسن­زاده، ایرج؛ محمدی، سلیمان (1395). تبیین معیارها و شاخص­های مدیریت پایدار جنگل، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر ایران، 24 (1)، 176-187.
لقمان­پور، مجید؛ الهی­، محسن؛ یخکشی، علی؛ واردانیان، ژهائیر (1392). سنجش پایداری دو منطقه جنگلی با دو نوع مدیریت مشارکتی و دولتی و تأثیر آن بر تنوّع گونه­های چوبی با استفاده از AHP­­. فصلنامه جنگل و مرتع، ۹۹­، 37-47.
مصداقی، منصور (1380). کتاب توصیف و تحلیل پوشش گیاهی. مشهد: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی دانشگاه فردوسی.
ملک­نیا، رحیم؛ فقهی، جهانگیر­؛ مخدوم­، مجید؛ مروی مهاجر­، محمد­رضا؛ زبیری، محمود (­1393). تهیة سیاهة معیار­ها و شاخص­های پایش پایداری کارکردهای اکولوژیکی جنگل­های شمال در سطح واحد مدیریت جنگل (مطالعة موردی: جنگل خیرود نوشهر). نشریه پژوهش­های محیط­زیست­، 5 (9)، 137-146.
میرک­زاده، علی­اصغر؛ بهرامی، مجید؛ غیاثوندغیاثی، فرشته (1390). تحلیل عوامل مؤثّر بر بهره­برداری پایدار از چوب جنگلی (مطالعة موردی: روستای دژن شهرستان کامیاران). نشریة جنگل و فرآورده­های چوب، 64، 91-106.
نوری­، زهرا؛ فقهی، جهانگیر؛ زاهدی امیری، قوام­الدین؛ زبیری­، محمود؛ رحمانی­، امین (­1389). ارزیابی تنوّع گونه­های درختی و درختچه­­ای و اثر آن در مدیریت پایداری جنگل (بررسی موردی: بخش پاتم جنگل خیرود). نشریة جنگل و فرآورده­های چوب (منابع طبیعی ایران)، 63 (2)، 201-214.
References
Adnan, M. & Holscher, D. (2011). Medicinal Plants In Old-Growth, Degraded And Re-Growth Forests Of NW Pakistan. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 2105-2114.
Ayalew, L., Yamagashi, H., Marui, H. & Kanno, T. (2005). Landslide in Sado Island of Japan: part II. GIS - based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Enginering Geology, 81, 432-445.
Barnes, B. V., ­Pregitzer K. S. ­& Spies, T. A­. (1982). Ecological forest site classification. Forestry, 80, 493-498.
Baycheva-Merger, T. & Wolfslehner, B. (2016). Evaluating the implementation of the PanEuropean criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management- A SWOT analysis. Ecological Indicators, 60, 1192-1199.
Bilbao-Terol, A.,­ Jiménez, M. & Arenas-Parra, M. (2016). A group decision making model based on goal programming with fuzzy hierarchy: an application to regional forest planning. Annals of Operations Research, 245 (1-2), 137-162.
Bosela, M.,­ Larocque, G.R., Baycheva-Merger,­ T., Valbuena, R. & Lier, M. (2015). Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management. In Ecological Forest Management Handbook, G.R. Larocque (Editor). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Christensen, M. ­& Heilmann, C. J. (2009). Forest Biodiversity Gradients and The Human Impact In Annapurna Conservation Area. Nepal Biodivers Conserv, 205, 2221-2232.
Elahi, M.,­ & Akbari Nia, M. (2014). Sustainability evaluation of three Semirom forest reserves in Isfahan. Iranian Journal of Natural Ecosystems, 5 (1), 49-63. (In Persian)
FAO. (1998). Practical Guidelines for Implementation of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in the Near East. Development Forestry Network, Cairo.
Glig, A., Hassanzadeh, I. & Mohammadi, S. (2016). Explaining the criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 24 (1), 176-187. (In Persian)
Grainger, A. (2012). Forest sustainability indicator systems as procedural policy tools in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 22 (1), 147-160.
Guidelines for monitoring and evaluation of natural resource management and watershed management plans, Iran. President. Deputy of Strategic Planning and Supervision, Office of Technical and Executive System, Forests, Rangelands and Watershed Management Organization, Office of Planning and Coordination (2009). Publications of the Vice President for Strategic Planning and Supervision, 505, 130-182. (In Persian)
Imani Rastabi, M.­, Jalilvand, H., & Zand Basiri, M. (2015). Evaluation of Socio-Economic Indices and Indicators in Monitoring the Kalgachi Lordegan Forestry Project. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23 (2), 199-208. (In Persian)
Islam, I., Siwar, C.S., Islami, M. & Hidayah,­ N. (2010). Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management in Malaysia. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 6 (3), 212-218.
Jalilova, G., Khadka., C. & Vacik, H. (2012). Developing criteria and indicators for evaluating sustainable forest management: A case study in Kyrgyzstan. Forest Policy and Economics, 21, 32-43.
JaliLvand, H., Karami, O., Shah Nazari, A. ­& Shabani, M. (2012). Recreational evaluation using Hierarchical analysis process (AHP) and Geographic Information System (GIS) Case study: Shahid Zare Forest Park, Mazandaran. Journal of Geography and Development, 29, 47-53. (In Persian)
Kazana, V., Kazaklis, A., Stamatiou, C., Koutsona, P., Boutsimea, A. & ­Fotakis, D. (2015). SWOT analysis and multiple criteria decision making methods for sustainable forest policy and management, a Greek case study.­ International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 7 (1), 32-50.
Khadka, Ch. & Vacik, H. (2012). Comparing a top-down and bottom-up approach in the identification on criteria and indicators for sustainable community forest management in Nepal. Forestry, 85 (1), 10-22.
Lingani, P., Savadogo, P., Tigabu, M. & Oden, P. (2011). Factors influencing people's participation in the forest management program in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Forest Policy and Economic, 13, 292-302.
Liu, J. Zhang, R. & Zhang, Q. (2012). Traditional Forest Knowledge of The Yi People Confronting Policy Reform And Social Changes In Yunnan Province Of China. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 1-9.
Loghmanpour, M., Elahi, M., Yakhkashi, A., & Vardanian, Zh. (2013). Assessing the sustainability of two forest areas with two types of participatory and governmental management and its impact on the diversity of wood species using AHP, Quarterly Journal of Forests and Rangeland, 99, (41), 37-47. (In Persian)
Lynch, T. B. & Rusydi, R. (1999). Distance Sampling for Forest Inventory in Indonesian Teak Plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 113, 215-221­.
Maleknia, R., Fiqhi, J., Makhdoom, M., Marvi Mohajer, M. & Zubairi, M. (2014). Preparation of a list of criteria and indicators for monitoring the ecological functions of northern forests at the forest management unit level (Case study: Khairud Nowshahr forest). Journal of Environmental Research, 5 (­9), 137-146. (In Persian)
Mesdaghi, M. (2001). Vegetation Description and Analysis Book. University Jihad Publications of Ferdowsi University. (In Persian)
Mirakzadeh, A., Asghar; Bahrami, M. & Ghiasvand Ghiasi, F. (2011). Analysis of Factors Affecting Sustainable Utilization of Forest Wood (Case Study: Dejan Village, Kamyaran City). Journal of Forest and Wood Products, 64, 91-106. (In Persian)
Nouri, Z., Fiqhi, J., Zahedi Amiri, Gh., Zubairi, M. & Rahmani, A. (2010). Evaluating the diversity of tree species and shrubs and its effect on forest sustainability management (Case study: Patem section of Khairud forest), Journal Forests and wood products. Iranian Natural Resources, 63 (­2), 201-214. (In Persian)
Rajeev, V. (­2011). New approaches to sustainable forest management: a study of service innovation in conserving forestry resources. Economics and Sustainable Developmen, 2, 65-80.
Richard, A. G., Mafuru, C. S., Paul, M., Kayombo, C. J., Kashindye, A. M., Chirenje, L. I. & Musamba, E. B. (2011). Human Activities Influencing Deforestation on Meru Catchment Forest Reserve, Tanzania. J. Hum Ecol, 33 (1), 17-20.
Sadeghi Kaji, H., Jafari, A. &­Yar Ali, N.­ (2015). Evaluation of Sustainable Forest Management in Doplan Watershed of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23 (­3), 490-­­501. (In Persian)
Sedigh Koohi, M., Rostami Shahraji, T. & Mohammadi Limaei, S. (2012). Application of Objective Planning in Sustainable Forest Management (Case Study: Series 11 of Shafarood Basin) Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, University of Gilan, Soomehsara Faculty of Natural Resources, Master Thesis. (In Persian)
Vierikko, K., Vehkamäki, S., Niemela, J., Pellikka, J. & Lindén, H. (­2008). Meeting the ecological, social and economic needs of sustainable forest management at a regional scale. Forestry, 23 (7), 431-44.
Zand Basiri, M. & Parvin, T. (2012). Investigating the Importance of Near East Process Criteria and Indicators in Sustainable Management of Zagros Forests (Case Study: Tang-e-Solak Watershed in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Provinces), Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 20 (2), 204­-­216. (In Persian)
Zhang, J. (2016). Weighing and realizing the environmental, economic and social goals of tourism development using an analytic network process-goal programming approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10 (16), 301-407.