A Field Study of the Function of Climatic Parameters in Tourism and the Validation of Bioclimatic Indices (Case Study: Gandoman Lagoon)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Climatology, University of Hakim Sabzevari, Sabzevar, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student of Urban Climatology, University of Hakim Sabzevari, Sabzevar, Iran

3 M.Sc. Student of Climatology, University of Hakim Sabzevari, Sabzevar, Iran

Abstract

Climate is considered as one of the most important factors affect the tourism industry. The present study is a field study that aims to investigate the role of climate in tourism and validate the performance of bioclimatic indices. This research has been carried out in Gondman lagoon area in Chahar Mahal and Bakhtiari province on the Nowruz holiday of 1396. The field data are collected through a questionnaire with axial topics including thermal sensation, thermal preference, aesthetics, adaptive behavior, and individual characteristics. Another part of the data is climate parameters such as temperature, relative humidity, cloudiness and wind, which is measured at the same time as completing the questionnaire by the lutron-lm-9000 data logger calibrated to CE standard. Bioclimatic indices (Predicted mean vote and Physiological Equivalent Temperature) are used to measure the thermal comfort conditions. Besides, Pearson correlation and multiple regression model are used to analyze the data. The results show that there is no significant correlation between the actual data obtained from the questionnaire and the data estimates by the indicators. Biochemical indicators show more warming conditions, while actual data often indicate a feeling of thermal cooling. In contrast, the thermal sensation of individuals reveals a significant and meaningful impact on independent climate parameters, the highest for clouds (R = -0.82) and humidity (R = -0.88). In other words, the visual conditions of the environment have a significant role in the type of person's sense of warmth. Due to the negative of these coefficients, cloudy sky with high humidity has significantly affected the type of heat feeling stated in the questionnaires. The use of bioclimatic indices in the evaluation of thermal comfort conditions requires the validation of these indicators and, if necessary, corrected.
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
Climatology in general investigates the wind, precipitation and other atmospheric elements in a region and in the specialized mode, the details of the relationship between atmospheric elements changes with special activities such as health, agriculture, transportation, architecture, maritime tourism, tourism, and so on. Awareness of climate comfort in human life and its everyday activities can play an important role. In terms of comfort conditions, a set of conditions is suitable for at least 80% of the people in terms of heat. By changing any of the aforesaid elements, the comfort condition is lost, and another element must be changed to compensate it. For example, if the temperature rises, the coating can be lowered, or it can achieve to a new comfort point by increasing air flow. The whole set of these points of comfort is called the Comfort Area, which is a very important debate in biology, climatology, health, tourism climatology, urban climatology, and architectural climates. Many of the bioclimatic indicators have been developed in laboratory or by selection of sample groups in different parts of the world (especially in the first world countries), and in many cases they can be used in a region of the world, such as our country. It is necessary to provide the results that are far from reality. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate and validate the use of this indicator in different parts of the country. In this way, the best measure can be a survey of people about their feelings of heat.
2-Materials and Methods
The present study was carried out based on field studies and data from a questionnaire. The completed questionnaire consists of 12 questions that are designed to fulfill the research objectives. In this questionnaire, the issues such as: thermal sensation, thermal preference, climate aesthetics, behavioral and comparative mechanisms along with individual and physiological characteristics are investigated. As each questionnaire is completed, the quantity of weather parameters (temperature, humidity, cloudiness and wind) is also recorded by the data logger. The Study period in this study was 13 days of the Nowruz holiday of 2017, and a total 167 people participated in the project and completed the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics such as correlation, multiple regression and t-test were used to analyze the information and data of the questionnaire. The bioclimatic indicators (in this study, PMV and PET), which are calculated using weather parameters and individual characteristics, in fact, indicate the conditions of the heat sensation of individuals, and the estimated values for these indicators The actual responses of individuals about their heat feelings were compared and evaluated to validate the level of ability and accuracy of the indicators in the research area.
3-Results and Discussion
The results of the statistical surveys showed that there is no significant and significant correlation between the actual data obtained from the questionnaire and the estimated values by the indicators. The correlation coefficient between the output of the indicators and the considerations of the questionnaire for the PMV index, R= 0.278 and for the PET index, was R = 0.270, while these correlations were not statistically significant for both indices. Bioclimatic Indicators showed more warming conditions, while the actual data often showed a sense of heat-sensitivity. Investigating the relationship between the data related to weather parameters (temperature, humidity, cloudiness and wind), independent and heat sensation of individuals, showed significant results. Regarding negative coefficients, it seems that cloudy sky with high humidity has been significantly effective in the type of heat feeling stated in the questionnaires.
4-Conclusion
Bioclimatic indicators show higher heating conditions, while the actual data often indicate a cooling sensation. On the other hand, the relationship between the data on climate parameters (temperature, humidity, cloudiness and wind), independent and heat sensation of individuals, showed more acceptable results. So that, the presence of cloudy conditions and high humidity along with increasing wind speed has caused the feeling of cooling in people. However, temperature changes alone have not been decisive in this regard. It seems that in the range of the year (April to March) in the study area, more than the temperature changes that control the person's thermal feelings, this change the humidity parameters are cloudy or decisive. The use of various biochemistry indices in many researches, regardless of the environmental and physiological differences that may have outcomes from the reality, is a prerequisite for the application of this indicator to be evaluated and verified in different geographical regions.
 

Keywords


برزه‌کار، قاسم (1384) پارک‌ها و تفرّجگاه­های جنگلی (مکان­یابی و طرح­ریزی)، چاپ اوّل،سازمان نظام مهندسی کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کشور، تهران.
بهروزی راد، بهروز (1387) تالاب­های ایران، سازمان جغرافیایی نیروهای مسلّح، تهران.
ذوالفقاری، حسن (1386) تعیین تقویم زمانی مناسب برای گردش در تبریز با استفاده از شاخص­های دمای معادل فیزیولوژیک  PET و متوسّط نظرسنجی پیش­بینی­شده (PMV)، مجلّة پژوهش­های جغرافیایی، 40 (1849)، صص. 141-129.
ذوالفقاری، حسن (1389) آب­وهواشناسی توریسم، چاپ چهارم، ویراست 2: با تجدید نظر و اضافات، انتشارات سمت، تهران.
رازجویان، محمود (1367) آسایش به­وسیلة معماری همساز با اقلیم، انتشاراتدانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران.
ﮔﻨﺪﻣﮑﺎر، امیر (1393) ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ زﻣﺎﻧﯽ و ﻣﮑﺎﻧﯽ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ اﻗﻠﯿﻢ ﮔﺮدﺷﮕﺮی اﺳﺘﺎن اﺻﻔﻬﺎن، فصلنامه ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻘﺎت ﺟﻐﺮاﻓﯿﺎﯾﯽ، 29 (114)، صص. 214-203.
گواهی، سعید؛ شجاعی­زاده، کبری؛ کریمی جشنی، ایوب (1389) ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ اﻗﻠﯿﻢ ﮔﺮدﺷﮕﺮی دﻣﺎی ﻣﻌﺎدل ﻓﯿﺰﯾﻮﻟﻮژی (PET) در شهر اهواز، ﺑﺎزة زﻣﺎﻧﯽ (2010-1980)، فصلنامه فضای گردشگری، 4 (15)، صص. 142-127.
موسوی بجنوردی، کاظم (1394) دانشنامه فرهنگ مردم ایران 1 (آب باران)، چاپ دوّم،مرکز دائرة المعارف بزرگ اسلامی، تهران.
Amelung, B., Moreno, A. (2009) Impacts of Climate Change on Tourism in Europe. PESETA – Tourism Study, Luxemburg: European Commission, Joint Research Centre Scientific and technical reports, pp. 43.
Cao, B., Luo, M., Li, M., Zhu, Y. (2016) Too Cold or too Warm? A Winter Thermal Comfort Study in Different Climate Zones in China, Energy and Buildings 133, pp. 469-477.
Cheng, V., Ng, E., Chan, C., Givoin, B. (2013) Outdoor Thermal Comfort Study in a Sub-Tropical Climate: A Longitudinal Sdudy Based in Hong Kong, International Journal of Biometeorology, 56 (1), pp. 43-56.
De Freitas C. R. (1990) Recreation Climate Assessment, International Journal of Climatology, 10 (1), pp. 89-103.
De Freitas, C. R. (2003) Tourism Climatology: Evaluating Environmental Information for Decision Making and Business Planning in the Recreation and Tourism Sector, International Journal of Biometeorology, 48 (1), pp. 45-54.
De Freitas, C. R., Scott, D., Mcboyle G. (2008) A Second-Generation Climate Index for Tourism (CIT): Specification and Verification, International Journal of Biometeorology, 52 (5), pp. 399-407.
Fanger, P. O. (1972) Thermal Comfort, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kotopouleas, A., Nikolopoulou, M. (2016) Thermal Comfort Conditions in Airport Terminals: Indoor or Transition Spaces, Building and environment, 99, pp. 184-199.
Lin, T-P., De Dear R., Wang, H. R-L. (2011) Effect of Thermal Adaptation on Seasonal Outdoor Thermal Comfort, International Journal of Climatology, 31, pp. 302-312.
Lindner-Cendrowska K. (2011) Wybrane Metody Oceny Warunków Klimatycznych Na Potrzeby Turystykii Rekreacji, In: M. Kuczera (Ed.), Młodzi naukowcy dla polskiej nauki, Kraków: Wydawnictwo CreativeTime, pp. 125-134.
Matzarakis, A. (2001) Assessing Climate for Tourism Purposes: Existing Methods and Tools for the Thermal Complex. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Climate, Tourism and Recreation, In: A. Matzarakis & C. R. de Freitas (Eds.), International Society of Biometeorology, Commission on Climate Tourism and Recreation, pp. 101-112.
Matzarakis, A., Mayer, H. (1996) Another Kind of Environmental Stress: Thermal Stress, WMO Collaborating Centre for Air Quality Management and Air Pollution Control, 18, pp. 7-10.
Matzarakis, A., Mayer, H. (1997) Heat Stress in Greece, International Journal of Biometeorology, 41 (1), pp. 34-39.
MAtzarakis, A., Rutz F., Ayer, H. M. (2007) Modelling Radiation Fluxes in Simple and Complex Environments–Application of the RayMan Model, International Journal of Biometeorology, 51 (4), pp. 323-334.
Oliveira, S., Andrade, H. (2007) An Initial Assessment of the Bioclimatic Comfort in an Outdoor Public Space in Lisbon, International Journal of Biometeorology, 52 (1), pp. 69-84.
Scott, D. (2006) Climate Change and Sustainable Tourism in the 21 st Century, In: Cukier, J. (Ed.) Tourism Research: Policy, Planning and Prospects. Department of Geography Publication Series, University of Waterloo, Ontario, pp. 175-248.
Scott, D., MCboyle, G. (2001). Using a‘Tourism Climate Index’ to Examine the Implications of Climate Change for Climate as a Tourism Resource, First International Workshop on Climate, Tourism and Recreation, Halkidiki, Greece.
Yahia, MW., Johansson, E. (2013) Evaluating the Behavior of Different Thermal Indices by Investigating Various Outdoor Urban Environments in the Hot Dry City of Damascus, Syria, International Journal of Biometeorology, 57 (4), pp. 615-630.
Yu, Y., Baizhan, L., Hong, L., Meilan, T., Runming, Y. (2015) A Study of Adaptive Thermal Comfort in a Well-Controlled Climate Chamber, Applied Thermal Engineering, 76, pp. 283-291.
Zengin, M., Kopar, I., Karahan, F. (2009) Determination of Bioclimatic Comfort in Erzurum- Rize Expressway Corridor Using GIS, Building and Enviroment, 45 (1), pp. 158-164.