Assessment of Visual Quality and the Perception of Landscapes in the Roads Leading to City (Case Study: Bojnord City)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Visual characteristics have an important contribution to the region's identity and sense of place.  It helps people enjoy the nature, built environment, cause investment attraction, socio-economic development of the region and attract tourists and their desire to return to the environment. Finding landscape and its perception by humans, plays an important role in the perception and his knowledge of the environment. The aim of the study is to evaluate the visual quality of landscapes in the main routes leading to Bojnord city and ranking them. In order to analyze the data, compilation of conceptual approaches to evaluate the perception of landscape and visual quality assessment method (LPD) is used. First, all major routes leading to Bojnord city were investigated through field studies using tools such as GPS, compass, maps of city and photography. Total 129 photographs, from different checkpoints in the three main routes leading to the city, were taken to study the visual perception of landscapes and 24 photos were chosen for final review. The main indicators, including six  items of "the position of the viewer", "distance vision", "landscape composition", "visual fragility", "the eye of the beholder" and "Best to see", in 17states, have been considered. According to the findings, route number one, with the highest points of view, under the viewer's feet and the lowest visual fragility, has a distinct perceptual quality from the other studied paths. The results of LPD method, show that this route, by the calculated of "P" (tourists' perception of perspective that is visible from all the sights in one place), is in the first level. Finally, qualitative analysis and perspective drawing of landscape perception rhythm in three directions, is provided.
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
It helps people enjoy the nature, built environment, cause investment attraction, socio-economic development of the region and attract tourists and their desire to return to the environment. Finding landscape and its perception by humans, plays an important role in the perception and his knowledge of the environment.
2- Materials and Method
This research is an applied one which has been done by descriptive-analytical method based on survey studies. The aim of the study is to evaluate the visual quality of landscapes in the main routes leading to Bojnord city and ranking them. In order to analyze the data, compilation of conceptual approaches to evaluate the perception of landscape and visual quality assessment method (LPD) is used. First, all major routes leading to Bojnord city were investigated through field studies using tools such as GPS, compass, maps of city and photography. Total 129 photographs, from different checkpoints in the three main routes leading to the city, were taken to study the visual perception of landscapes and 24 photos were chosen for final review. The main indicators, including six  items of "the position of the viewer", "distance vision", "landscape composition", "visual fragility", "the eye of the beholder" and "Best to see", in 17states, have been considered.
 3- Results and Discussion
According to the findings, route number one, with the highest points of view, under the viewer's feet and the lowest visual fragility, has a distinct perceptual quality from the other studied paths. The results of LPD method, show that this route, by the calculated of "P" (tourists' perception of perspective that is visible from all the sights in one place), is in the first level. Finally, qualitative analysis and perspective drawing of landscape perception rhythm in three directions, is provided. Route No. 1, with appropriate visual quality landscapes compared to other paths studied, has an optimal and intermittent rhythm of visual perception. The plotted rhythm actually represents the degree, intensity, and frequency of the establishment of natural factors (natural attractions) in the visual quality of the landscapes in the studied paths. A set of natural factors including unique visibility, visual fragility, green zones, mountains, parks and nodes have been considered in this drawing. Thus in the studied paths, based on these factors and the number of them, assuming that these factors are enhancing the quality of landscape perception on the path, rhythm drawings are made.
 4- Conclusion
Considering the methods used in this research, calculated value for factor 'P", (the amount of perception that a visitor receives from all the sights in one place), in sum of the entire route, can be used to classify paths in terms of landscape perception. According to the results of the research, based on the calculated value of P, route No. 1 with the score of 6025 is in the first priority and routes No. 3 and No. 2, in the order, with the score of 711 and 576 are in the second and third priority. Of course, this prioritization can be the basis for investments to improve the visual quality of the scenery on the routes. In this way, while paying attention to the traceability of the route and preserving the aspects of its natural environment, natural and unique tourism identity can be added to the path. Thus, the suggestion is that any planning and design of the main routes leading to the city of Bojnord should be taken into account the factor of "visual perception of the landscape". Regarding the higher score of route number one, it is better to see the first priority in this route. Of course, it should be noted that these plans should not destroy the intact environment in the path or harm it. Therefore, it requires a planned and more knowledgeable approach to organize the natural attractions and its texture. Therefore, the classification of routes according to the perception of the landscape (visual qualities) can be the priority of any action for the prosperity of tourism. In addition, research findings can enhance the natural identity of the region and ultimately improve the quality of the city's environment and its surroundings.

Keywords


احمدی، فریال؛ صادقی، علی‌رضا، پورجعفر؛ محمدرضا (1389) بازخوانی اصول و تفکرات حاکم طرّاحی منظر پایدار، همایش ملی معماری و شهرسازی معاصر ایران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بیضاء، بیضاء.
افتخار، یاسمین (1392) طبیعت شهر رویکرد هویّت‌گرا در پارک هوتن شانگهای، منظر، 22، صص. 59-56.
انصاری، مجتبی؛ صادقی، علیرضا؛ احمدی، فریال؛ حقیقت‌بین، مهدی (1387) هویّت‌بخشی به محلاّت بافت‌های فرسودة شهری با تأکید بر ساماندهی نظام بصری، آینة خیال، 11، صص. 100-93.
انصاری مود، محمد حسین؛ معصومی، سعید (1389) در جستجوی هویّت شهری بجنورد، مرکز مطالعاتی و تحقیقاتی شهرسازی و معماری، تهران.
پاکزاد، جهانشاه (1388) سیر اندیشه‌ها در شهرسازی از فضا تا مکان، جلد سوّم، چاپ اوّل، انتشارات شهیدی، تهران.
دویران، اسماعیل؛ خدایی، داود؛ غلامی، سعید؛ دانش‌دوست، مهرداد (1391) سنجش مؤلّفه‌های آسایش بصری در منظر شهری (با تأکید بر محلّة حسینیة اعظم زنجان)، جغرافیا و مطالعات محیطی، 1 (3)، صص. 60-45.
رجایی، محمد علی؛ زحمتکش، مرضیه (1385) نقش عوامل جغرافیایی و زیست‌محیطی در مکان‌یابی شهرهای جدید، شرکت عمران شهرهاى جدید، تهران.
رفیعانی خاچک، پریسا؛ محمدزاده، مرجان؛ میرکریمی، سید حامد (1393)ارزیابی بصری کیفیّت منظره‌ها بر اساس رهیافت ادراکی، الگویی برای مدیریت مطلوب‌تر مناطق طبیعی تفرّجی (مطالعة موردی: مسیرهای پیاده‌روی حوضة آبخیز زیارت گرگان)، پژوهش‌های محیط‌زیست، 5 (9)، صص. 14-3.
زندیه، مهدی؛ زندیه، راضیه (1389) در جستجوی کریدورهای دید راهبردی شهر تهران، انجمن علمی معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 1، صص. 36-27.
سعیدی، سپیده؛ محمدزاده، مرجان؛ سلمان ماهینی، عبدالرسول؛ میرکریمی، سید حامد (1393) ارزیابی و مدل‌سازی ارزش منظره‌ای سیمای سرزمین به روش ترکیب خطّی وزنی (مطالعة موردی: مسیرهای پیاده‌روی آبخیز زیارت استان گلستان)، محیط‌زیست طبیعی، منابع طبیعی ایران، 67(3)، صص. 311-301.
کبیری هندی، مریم؛ دانه‌کار، افشین؛ علیزاده، افشین؛ خراسانی، نعمت‌اله (1392) کاربرد روش TOPSIS در شناسایی مناطق طبیعی حفاظتی با ارزش معنوی در شهرستان نیشابور، محیط‌زیست طبیعی، مجلّة منابع طبیعی ایران، 66 (1)، صص. 76-61.
گلچین، پیمان؛ ناروئی، بهروز؛ مثنوی، محمدرضا (1391) ارزیابی کیفیّت بصری فضاهای آموزشی بر اساس ترجیحات استفاده‌کنندگان (مطالعة موردی: دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان)، محیط‌شناسی، 38 (62)، صص. 150-135.
متولی، مسعود (1389) بررسی و سنجش کیفیّت زیبایی در منظر شهری بر اساس مفهوم دیدهای متوالی (نمونة موردی مسیر گردشگری دارآباد تهران)، آرمانشهر، 5، صص. 139-123.
مخدوم، مجید (1390) طرّاحی و مهندسی پارک‌های ملی و جنگلی، چاپ اوّل، مرکز نشر دانشگاهی، تهران.
میرکریمی، سید حامد؛ سعیدی، سپیده؛ محمدزاده، مرجان؛ سلمان ماهینی، عبدالرسول (1393) کاربرد روش PCA در ارزیابی کیفیّت بصری سیمای سرزمین (مطالعة موردی: حوزة زیارت استان گلستان)، محیط‌شناسی، 40 (2)، صص. 462-451.
Abazari, Z., Mehrabi, SH., (2015) The Role of Ecologically Green Landscape on User's Visual Perceptions of Public Libraries of the Municipality in Tehran (Capital of Iran), International Journal of Management and Applied Sciece, 1 (9), 75-78.
Ayala, R. M., Ramirez, J. P., Camargo, S. S.( 2003) Valoración de la Calidad y Fragilidad Visual del Paisage en el Valle de Zapotitlán de las Salinas, Puebla (México), Boletín de la AGEN, 35, pp. 123-136.
Caiani S. Z. (2014) Framing Visual perception in terms of Sensorimotor mapping, The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 9, pp. 1-16.
Corry, R. C., Nassauer, J. I. ( 2002) Managing for Small- Patch Patterns in Human-Dominated Landscapes, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
Daily, G. C. (Ed.) (1997) Nature's Service: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Island Press, Washington.
Daily, G. C. (2000) Management Objectives for the Protection of Ecosystem Services, Environmental Science & Policy, 3 (6), pp. 333-339.
Department of sustainability and Environment (2010) Users Guide to the Australian Walking Track Grading System,State Government Victoria, Wilsons Promontory National Park Australi.
Dye, A. S., Shaw, S. (2007) A GIS-Based Spatial Decision Support System for Tourists of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Retailing and Consumer Services, 14, pp. 269-278.
Farias, E. I.; Ricardo Grau, T. H., Camps, A. ( 2005) Trail Preferences and Visitor Characteristics in Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici National Park, Spain. Mountain Research and Development, 25 (1), pp. 51-59.
Giusti, A., Guzzi J., Ciresan D. C., He, F. L., Rodríguez, J. P., Fontana, F., Faessler, M., Forster, Ch. Schmidhuber, J., Di Caro, G., Scaramuzza, D., Gambardella, L. M. (2015) A Machine Learning Approach to Visual Perception of Forest Trails for Mobile Robots, Ieee Robotics and Automation Letters, PREPRINT VERSION, ACCEPTED NOVEMBER, pp. 1-7.
Hillery, M., Nancarrow, B., Griffin, G., Syme, G. (2001) Tourist Perception of Environmental Impact, Annals of Tourism Research, 28 (4), pp. 853-867.
Johnston, S. W., Growcock, A. J. (2005) Visiting the Kosciuszko Alpine Area: Visitor Numbers, Characteristics and Activities, CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd, Australia.
Junge, X., Jacot, K. A., Bosshard, A., Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2009) Swiss People's Attitudes Towards Field Margins for Biodiversity Conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 17 (3), pp.150-159.
Karjalainen, E. (2006) The Visual Preferences for Forest Regeneration and Field Afforestation- Four Case Studies in Finland. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki, Finland.
Kyle, G. T., Absher, J. D., Graefe, A. R. (2003) The Moderating Role of Place Attachment on the Relationship between Attitudes Toward Fees and Spending Preferences, Leisure Sciences, 25, pp. 33-50.
Leopold, D. A. (2003) Visual Perception: Shaping What We See, Current Biology, 13 (8), pp. 10-12.
Lindemann-Matthiesa, P., Jungea, X., Matthies, D. (2010) The Influence of Plant Diversity on People's Perception and Aesthetic Appreciation of Grassland Vegetation, Biological Conservation, 143 (1), pp. 195-202.
Lynn, N. A., Brown, R. D., (2003) Effects of Recreational Use of Impacts on Hiking Experiences in Natural Areas, Landscape and Urban Planning, 64 (1-2), pp. 77-87.
McHarg, I. L. (1971) Design with Nature, Natural History Press, New York.
Petrosillo, I., Zurlini, G., Corlianò, M. E., Zaccarelli, N., Dadamo, M. (2007) Tourist Perception of Recreational Environment and Management in a Marine Protected Area, Landscape and Urban Planning, 79 (1), pp. 29-37.
Renjie, L., Zi, L., Jifeng, L. (2012) Quantitative Calculation of Eco-Tourist's Landscape Perception: Strength, and Spatial Variation within Ecotourism Destination, Ecological Informatics, 10, pp. 73-80.
Rogala, M., Maddern, C. (2007) Walking Trails Classification System – A Report of Research Findings, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne, Australia.
Rogge, E., Nevens, F., Gulinck, H. (2007) Perception of Rural Landscapes in Flanders: Looking Beyond Aesthetics, Landscape and Urban Planning, 82 (4), pp. 159-174.
Schnurr, J., Holtz, S. (Eds.), (1998) The Cornerstone of Development: Integrating Environmental, Social and Economic Policies, Lewis Publishers, BocaRaton, FL, Ottawa, Canada.
Sundli Tveit, A., Ode Sang, A., Hagerhall, C. M. (2012) Scenic Beauty: Visual Landscape Assessment and Human Landscape Perception, Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, Wiley-Blackwell, United Kingdom, pp. 38-46.
Vargues, P., Loures, L. (2008) Using Geographic Information Systems in Visual and Aesthetic Analysis: The Case Study of a Golf Course in Algarve, Wseas Transactions on Environment and Development, 9 (4), pp. 774-783.