Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Satellite Imagery and Random Forest Regression Model

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 Department of Forestry and Dr. Hedayat Ghazanfari Center for Research and Development of Northern Zagros Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

Abstract

Accurate assessment of forest above-ground biomass is essential for sustainable forest management. Estimation of forest biomass is necessary for studies such as estimation of greenhouse gases, carbon stored in forest resources and climate change models. Also, the forest biomass represents the production rate per unit area. The optical image data of Sentinel-2 satellite was used to estimate the above-ground biomass of the forest in the area of 285 hectares of the forests in Ilam province. 124 square-shaped sample plots with a 20×20 m dimension were located on the ground using a cluster method. Some characteristics of a total of 508 trees (both single stems and coppice forms), including the major and minor crown diameters were measured within each sample plot. Depending on whether the trees are single stem and multi-stem clumps, suitable allometric equations were used to calculate the above-ground biomass based on the measured characteristics. Finally, the total above-ground biomass was calculated for all trees in each sample plot. In order to estimate the above-ground biomass, MSI sensor images of Sentinel 2 satellite were used at the level of L2A corrections. Using spectral ratios, vegetation indices were calculated. In the next step, the corresponding spectral values of the sample plots were extracted from the main bands, and vegetation indices. A random forest regression model was used to estimate forest above-ground biomass. 70% of the samples were used for training the model, and the models were validated using the remaining 30% of the data. The results with R2=0.80 and RMSE=28.70 t/ha showed the acceptable performance of model for estimating the above-ground biomass of the forest. By using the Gini statistic, it was shown that RVI, GNDVI, NDVI, and DVI vegetatuin inices played a larger role in the estimation of biomass.
 
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
 Accurate assessment of forest above-ground biomass is essential for sustainable forest management. Estimation of forest biomass is necessary for studies such as the estimation of greenhouse gases, carbon stored in forest resources, and climate change models. Also, the forest biomass represents the production rate per unit area. Estimating forest biomass through direct measurements and cutting and weighing trees in the forests provides an accurate estimate of biomass, but it is a destructive, difficult, and time-consuming method. Therefore, the use of remote sensing methods is very important in the estimation of biomass.
 
2-Materials and Methods
The optical image data of the Sentinel-2 satellite was used to estimate the forest above-ground biomass in the area of 285 hectares of the forests in Ilam province. 124 square-shaped sample plots with a 20×20 m dimension were located on the ground using a cluster sampling strategy. Some characteristics of a total of 508 trees (both single stems and coppice forms), including the major and minor crown diameters were measured within each sample plot. Depending on whether the trees are single-stem or multi-stem clumps, suitable allometric equations were used to calculate the above-ground biomass based on the measured characteristics. Finally, the total above-ground biomass was calculated for all trees in each sample plot. In order to estimate the above-ground biomass, MSI sensor images of the Sentinel 2 satellite were used at the level of L2A corrections. Using spectral ratios, vegetation indices were calculated. In the next step, the corresponding spectral values of the sample plots were extracted from the original bands and vegetation indices. The correlation coefficient between the values of the original bands and vegetation indices with the amount of biomass calculated from the allometric equations in the sample plots was investigated. A random forest regression model was used to estimate forest above-ground biomass. 70% of the samples were used for training the model, and the models were validated using the remaining 30% of the data.
 
3- Results and Discussion
 The results of the descriptive statistics of above-ground forest biomass measured in 120 sample plots which were calculated using allometric equations showed that the lowest biomass in the sample plots is 0.61 and the highest is 268.88 tons per hectare. The average above-ground biomass per tree was measured as 657.6 and 231.2 kg in the single and multi-stemmed trees, respectively. The results of the correlation analysis of biomass with the investigated variables showed that among the main bands of the sensor, the red wavelength has the highest correlation (0.402) with biomass due to the high chlorophyll absorption of green plants in this wavelength. Among the vegetation indices investigated in the research, RVI and NDVI indices have the highest correlation with the forest above-ground biomass with a correlation coefficient of 0.529 and 0.525, respectively. The results of random forest regression analysis to estimate the forest above-ground biomass with R2=0.80, RMSE=28.70 t/ha show the acceptable performance of the model for estimating the above-ground biomass of the forest. Since in this research, the amount of forest above-ground biomass of the sample plots is calculated based on allometric equations in a part of Zagros forests; but these equations are not exactly related to the studied area, part of the model error can be due to this reason. By using the Gini statistic, it was shown that RVI, GNDVI, NDVI, and DVI vegetation indices played a larger role in the estimation of biomass. RVI, NDVI, and DVI indices are calculated using red and near-infrared bands, and since they are influenced by the photosynthetic activity of plants, they are very important in estimating the amount of biomass. GNDVI, which is calculated using green and near-infrared bands, is an indicator of the level of greenness or photosynthetic activity of the plant and is highly sensitive to changes in the chlorophyll content of plants.
 
4- Conclusion
 The results of forest above-ground biomass estimation using Sentinel 2 satellite images and random forest regression method showed that using the non-parametric method of the random forest regression model, which performs a large number of uncorrelated models; it has an acceptable ability to estimate forest biomass. Also, the findings showed that vegetation indices are more important in the process of forest above-ground biomass estimation model than Sentinel 2 original bands. The findings of the present research provide the possibility for the managers of Zagros forests to estimate the forest above-ground biomass and provide the basis for sustainable forest management strategies.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Adão, T., Hruška, J., Pádua, L., Bessa, J., Peres, E., Morais, R., & Sousa, J.J. (2017). Hyperspectral Imaging: A Review on UAV-Based Sensors, data processing and applications for agriculture and forestry. Remote Sens, 9, 1110. doi: 10.3390/rs9111110
Ahamed, T., Tian, L., Zhang, Y., & Ting, K. C. (2011). A review of remote sensing methods for biomass feedstock production. Biomass and bioenergy, 35(7), 2455-2469. doi: 10.1016/j. biombioe.2011.02.028
Aschbacher, J., & Milagro-Pérez, M.P. (2012). The european earth monitoring (GMES) programme status and perspectives. Remote Sensing of Environment, 120, 3–8.  doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08. 028
Attarchi, S., & Gloaguen, R. (2014). Improving the estimation of above ground biomass using dual polarimetric PALSAR and ETM+ data in the Hyrcanian mountain forest (Iran). Remote Sensing, 6, 3693-3715. doi: 10.3390/rs6053693
Bajwa, S., Zhang, Y., & Shirzadifar, A. (2018). Hyperspectral Image Data Mining. Fundamentals, Sensor Systems, Spectral Libraries, and Data Mining for Vegetation. CRC Press, 273-302. doi: 10.1201/9781315164151-10
Barboza, T. O., Ardigueri, M., Souza, G. F., Ferraz, M. A., Gaudencio, J. R., & Santos, A. F. (2023).Performance of Vegetation Indices to Estimate Green Biomass Accumulation in Common Bean. AgriEngineering, 5, 2, 840–854. doi: 10.3390/agriengineering5020052
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
Buschmann, C. (1993). Fernerkundung von Pflanzen: Ausbreitung, Gesundheitszustand und Produktivität. Naturwissenschaften, 80 (10), 439-453. https://link.springer.com/article/10. 1007/BF01136034
Chang, J., & Shoshany, M. (2016). Mediterranean shrublands biomass estimation using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2. In 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (pp. 5300-5303). IEEE.
Chinembiri, T.S., Bronsveld, M.C., Rossiter, D.G., & Dube, T. (2013). The precision of C stock estimation in the Ludhikola watershed using model-based and design-based approaches. Natural Resources Research, 22, 297–309. doi: 10.1007/s11053-013-9216-6.
David, R. M., Rosser, N. J., & Donoghue, D. N. M. (2022). Improving above ground biomass estimates of Southern Africa dryland forests by combining Sentinel-1 SAR and Sentinel-2 multispectral imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 282, 113232. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2022. 113232.
Gara, T. W., Murwira, A., Chivhenge, E., Dube, T., & Bangira, T. (2014). Estimating wood volume from canopy area in deciduous woodlands of Zimbabwe. Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science, 76(4), 237–244. doi: 10.2989/20702620.2014.965981
Gómez, D., Salvador, P., Sanz, J., & Casanova, J.L. (2019). Potato Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques and Sentinel 2 Data. Remote Sensing, 11 (15), 1745. doi: 10.3390/ rs11151745
Güneralp, İ., Filippi, A. M., & Randall, J. (2014). Estimation of floodplain aboveground biomass using multispectral remote sensing and nonparametric modeling. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 33, 119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.05.004.
Guyot, G., Baret, F., & Major, D. J. (1988). High spectral resolution: Determination of spectral shifts between the red and infrared. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 11, 750–760. https://www.isprs.org/proceedings/Xxvii/congress/part7/750_XXVII-part7-sup. pdf
https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/missions/sentinel-2/instrument-payload/resolution-and-swath.
Huete, A. R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote sensing of environment, 25(3), 295-309. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X
Huete, A. R., Liu, H. Q., Batchily, K. V., & Van Leeuwen, W. J. D. A. (1997). A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS. Remote sensing of environment, 59 (3), 440-451. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00112-5
Imran, A. B., & Ahmed, S. (2018). Potential of Landsat-8 spectral indices to estimate forest biomass. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 3(4), 303-314. doi: 10.22034/IJHCUM.2018.04.04
Imran, A. B., Khan, K., Ali, N., Ahmad, N., Ali, A., & Shah, K. (2020). Narrow band based and broadband derived vegetation indices using Sentinel-2 Imagery to estimate vegetation biomass. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(1), 97-108. doi: 10.22034/GJESM.2020.01.08.
Iranmanesh, Y. (2014). Assessment on biomass estimation methods and carbon sequestration of Quercus brantii Lindl. in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari forests. (PhD Thesis), Tarbiat Modares University (In Persian).
Ji, L., & Peters, A.J. (2007). Performance evaluation of spectral vegetation indices using a statistical sensitivity function. Remote Sensing of Environment, 106 (1), 59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006. 07.010
Kronseder, K., Ballhorn, U., Böhm, V., & Siegert, F. (2012). Above ground biomass estimation across forest types at different degradation levels in Central Kalimantan using LiDAR data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.01.010
Lu, D. (2005). Aboveground biomass estimation using Landsat TM data in the Brazilian Amazon. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(12), 2509–2525. doi: 10.1080/ 01431160500142145
Lu, Dengsheng, Chen, Q., Wang, G., Liu, L., Li, G., & Moran, E. (2016). A survey of remote sensing-based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems. International Journal of Digital Earth, 9 (1), 63–105. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2014.990526
Luz, L. R., Giongo, V., Santos, A. M. D., Lopes, R. J. D. C., & Júnior, C. D. L. (2022). Biomass and vegetation index by remote sensing in different caatinga forest areas. Ciência Rural, 52. doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20201104
Mahmoudi, H., Pir Bavaghar, M., & Fatehi, P. (2020). Deforestation Risk Zoning Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 10(3), 91-106. doi: 10.22126/ges.2020.5799.2299 (In Persian).
Miri, N., Darvishsefet, A., Shakeri, Z., & Zargham, N. (2017). Estimation of leaf area index in Zagros forests using Landsat 8 data. Iranian Journal of Forest, 9(1), 29-42. https://www. jf-isaforestry.ir/article_47046.html?lang=fa (In Persian).
Mirrajabi, H., Oladi, J., & Mataji, A. (2016). Estimating above Ground Carbon Storage in Urban Afforestation Using Satellite Data (Case Study: Chitgar Forest Park in Tehran). Ecology of Iranian Forests, 4 (7), 35-42. https://ifej.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-223-fa.pdf (In Persian).
Moradi, F., Darvishsefat, A. A., Namiranian, M., & Ronoud, G. (2018). Investigating the capability of Landsat 8 OLI data for estimation of aboveground woody biomass of common hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) stands in Khyroud Forest. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 26(3), 406-420. doi: 10.22092/ijfpr.2018.117743 (In Persian)
Moradi, G., Pir Bavaghar, M., Shakeri, Z., & Fatehi, P. (2020). Leaf area index estimation in the northern Zagros forests using remote sensing (Case study: a part of Baneh forests). Forest Research and Development, 6(4), 679-693. doi: 10.30466/jfrd.2020.120986 (In Persian).
Mutanga, O., Adam, E., & Cho, M. A. (2012). High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.012
Nilsson, M., Folving, S., Kennedy, P., Puumalainen, J., Chirici, G., Corona, P., Marchetti, M., Olsson, H., Ricotta, C., Ringvall, A., Stahl, G., & Tomppo, E. (2004). Combining remote sensing and field data for deriving unbiased estimates of forest parameters over large regions. (eds) Advances in Forest Inventory for Sustainable Forest Management and Biodiversity Monitoring. Forestry Sciences, vol 76. Springer, Dordrecht. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-0649-0_ 2 10.1007/978-94-017-0649-0_2.
Pandey, P. C., Srivastava, P. K., Chetri, T., Choudhary, B. K., & Kumar, P. (2019). Forest biomass estimation using remote sensing and field inventory: a case study of Tripura, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(9), 593. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7730-7
Pinty, B., & Verstraete, M. (1992). GEMI: A Non-Linear Index to monitor global vegetation from satellites. Vegetation, 101, 15-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00031911
Powell, S. L., Cohen, W. B., Healey, S. P., Kennedy, R. E., Moisen, G. G., Pierce, K. B., & Ohmann, J. L. (2010). Quantification of live aboveground forest biomass dynamics with Landsat time-series and field inventory data: A comparison of empirical modeling approaches. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(5), 1053–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.12.018
Qi, J., Chehbouni, A., Huete, A. R., Kerr, Y. H., & Sorooshian, S. (1994). A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote sensing of environment, 48 (2), 119-126. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257 (94) 90134-1
Ramoelo, A., Cho, M., Mathieu, R., & Skidmore, A. K. (2014). The potential of Sentinel-2 spectral configuration to assess rangeland quality. Proc.SPIE, 9239, 92390C. doi: 10.1117/12.2067315
Ronoud, G., Fatehi, P., Darvishsefat, A. A., Tomppo, E., Praks, J., & Schaepman, M. E. (2021). Multi-sensor aboveground biomass estimation in the broadleaved Hyrcanian forest of Iran. Canadian journal of remote sensing, 47 (6), 818-834. doi: 10.1080/07038992.2021.1968811
Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. NASA Spec. Publ, 351 (1), 309. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/ 19740022614
Ruiz-Peinado, R., Montero, G., & Del Rio, M. (2012). Biomass models to estimate carbon stocks for hardwood tree species. Forest Systems, 21(1), 42-52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/fs/ 2112211-02193
Saed Mocheshei, A., Pir Bavaghar, M., Shabanian, N., & Fatehi, P. (2019). Possibility of estimating the woody species diversity using Sentinel optical imagery (Case study: Marivan forests). Forest and Wood Products, 72(2), 101-110. doi: 10.22059/jfwp.2019.271590.984 (In Persian).
Safari, A., & Sohrabi, H. (2020). Using the bootstrap approach for comparing statistical modeling methods to estimate remotely-sensed aboveground biomass in Zagros forests. RS & GIS for natural resources, 11 (2), 49-67 (In Persian).
Saroei, S., Darvishsefat, A. A., & Namiranian, M. (2021). Modeling the Above-Ground Biomass Estimation in Zagros Oak Coppice Forests Using Radar Data of Sentinel-1 Satellite. Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 12 (4), 35-52. doi: 10.52547/gisj.12.4.35 (In Persian).
Shamsoddini, A., & Ahmadi, W. (2020). Spatio – Temporal Estimation of Carbon Monoxide and Nitrogen Dioxide based on Remote Sensing Data and Ancillary Data in Tehran. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 10(3), 107-124. doi: 10.22126/ges.2020.4227.2057 (In Persian).
Singh, C., Karan, S. K., Sardar, P., & Samadder, S. R. (2022). Remote sensing-based biomass estimation of dry deciduous tropical forest using machine learning and ensemble analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 308, 114639. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114639
Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127-150. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0
Vafaei, S., Soosani, J., Adeli, K., Fadaei, H., & Naghavi, H. (2017). Estimation of aboveground biomass using optical and radar images (Case study: Nav-e Asalem forests, Gilan). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 25(2), 320-331. doi: 10.22092/ijfpr.2017.111776 (In Persian).
Xue, J., & Su, B. (2017). Significant Remote Sensing Vegetation Indices: A Review of Developments and Applications. Journal of Sensors, 2017, 1353691. doi: 10.1155/2017/1353691.
Zhang, C., Denka, S., Cooper, H., & Mishra, D. R. (2018). Quantification of sawgrass marsh aboveground biomass in the coastal Everglades using object-based ensemble analysis and Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204, 366–379. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.018.
Zhang, Y., & Wang, R. (2022). Estimation of aboveground biomass of vegetation based on landsat 8 OLI images. Heliyon, 8(11), e11099. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11099.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics