Landslide Risk Zoning using Logistic Regression and Anfis Models in Hashtjin Catchment Area in Ardabil Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Landslides are one of the most important environmental processes, especially in mountainous landscapes. Identifying sensitive areas and preparing a landslide risk zoning map is an important step in preventing and reducing the damage caused by this phenomenon. Hashtjin basin, with its mountainous face and considering the geological, lithological, climatic and human conditions, has the necessary conditions for the formation of landslides; therefore, the current study aims at landslide risk zoning in the given area. Therefore, landslide sensitivity analysis for Hashtjin watershed is evaluated according to the efficiency of the results obtained from two models of logistic regression and Anfis to achieve the research goal. Using the interpretation of aerial photographs and field visits, control areas, as a dependent variable, were recorded by GPS. Then, the factors affecting landslides in the area including slope, direction, elevation lines, distance from waterway, distance from fault, distance from road, geology, land use and rainfall were identified according to various sources, field studies and consultation with experts; Then, layers were prepared as independent variables in GIS Arc environment. Moreover, logistic and ANFIS regression models were implemented by entering the aforesaid layers into TERRSET and MATLAB software environment, respectively. The final landslide hazard map of the area was prepared in 5 hazard classes. In this study, 25% of the control samples were used as test data to measure the accuracy of the studied models. The results of validation of the performance of the mentioned models by performing the ROC curve showed that the accuracy of Anfis model and logistic regression were equal to 88.23 and 86.45%, respectively. The findings from Enfis model reveal that approximately 4854 hectares, equivalent to 20.6% of the Hashtjin area are in high and very high class in terms of landslide risk.
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
Landslides are defined as the displacement of soil under the influence of gravity. It is one of the most destructive and catastrophic geological hazards that has a lot of harmful impacts on human societies every year, including economic damage, destruction of infrastructure and environmental problems. Identifying landslide-prone areas and mass movements is a necessity for natural resource management and development planning. In this regard, mapping landslide-prone areas is one of the most important steps required for planning and decision-making in the field of land use. Mass movements are in special situations. Iran, with its mainly mountainous topography, high tectonic and seismic activity, climatic and geological diversity, has natural conditions for a wide range of landslides. Hashtjin watershed located in Ardabil province, which is geomorphologically the western and northern part of the mountain basin and consists of high slopes with high slopes, is no exception to this rule. The study of landslide distribution in this basin shows that a lot of landslides have occurred and have high potential from unstable slopes. Based on field observations, several landslides have occurred in this area and more landslides are very likely to occur. In fact, it is necessary to pay attention to the landslides of this time zone.
2-Materials and Methods
In order to investigate the status of landslides in the past, as educational sample points, and also to determine the factors affecting its occurrence in Hashtjin region, first the aerial photographs of the region during the period from 2015 to 2020 were reviewed. Then, Aerial reconnaissance and adaptation to terrestrial realities were carried out with the help of the natives of the area to confirm the findings from photo interpretation. By field survey, 41 landslides were identified in the study area and the position and limits of each of them were recorded using a GPS device. At the same time, the factors affecting the occurrence of landslides in the region were determined in the field visit including slope, direction, elevation lines, distance from the waterway, distance from the road, lithology status and land cover / land use. In this study, slope, direction and elevation lines maps were prepared using DEM (digital elevation model) ten meters ASTER. Besides, the waterway map of the area was drawn using ARC / Hydro plugin. The road map of the region was also obtained from the data of the Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. Also, the lithological status map of the region was digitized from the geological map with the scale of 1: 100000. Slope, direction, elevation, lithology and land cover / land use maps that needed to be classified were also classified after scoring.
3-Results and Discussion
Comparison of lithological map (Figure 6) with spatial distribution of landslides (Figure 2) and logistic regression equation (Equation 12) and zoning maps obtained from quantitative research models (Figures 10 and 12) show the decisive effect of lithology on landslide occurrence in the given study area. In terms of the percentage of the area in ​​high and very high risk classes, both methods indicate almost similar results, so that it can be claimed that approximately 23% of the study area is in high and very high risk class, which are mainly in the western part of the area, Hashtjin. A set of conditions has made landslides very likely to occur in parts of the study area. Nevertheless, the dispersion of specific geological formations that provide very favorable conditions for slope instability in the form of mass destruction are of paramount importance. Most of the landslides in the area occurred on the lithological units of the old alluvial sediment units, the basaltic trachea unit and the worn surface andesite trachea unit. The findings from zoning and spatial prediction of both models show the zones corresponding to these units have a high probability of landslides. This poses a serious threat to the settlements and infrastructure located on these zones. The construction of communication roads on these landslide-sensitive units has not only increased the risks of landslides, but also triggered slope instability. As a result, slope, slope direction and height play a decisive role in the occurrence of landslides on these lithological units.
4-Conclusion
The results of Table (No. 3) illustrate that about 6100 hectares, equivalent to 26% of the Hashtjin area is in high and very high class in terms of landslide risk. According to the results presented in Table (No. 4) based on the fuzzy-neural model, it is revealed that about 4854 hectares, equivalent to 20.6% of the Hashtjin area is in high and very high classes in terms of slippery land. The results of the unique ROC analysis showed that exactly the fuzzy-neural model is better and more acceptable than the logistic regression model.
 
 

Keywords


References
Aghdam, I. N., Pradhan, B. & Panahi, M. (2017). Landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid model of statistical bivariate methods (FR and WOE) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) at southern Zagros Mountains in Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76 (6), 237.
Ajal Louian, R., Mir Sanei, R. & Fatehi, ­L. (2013). Applied Landslide Recognition and Analysis. Isfahan. University Jihad Publications (In Persian).
Asghari, S. & Blavasi, I. A. (2018). Comparison of artificial neural network model with fuzzy logic model in landslide risk assessment Case study: Seymareh Chenar catchment. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 7 (2), 158-182 (In Persian).
Ayalew, L. & Yamagishi, H. (2005. (The application of GIS-based Logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yaahiko Mountains, central Japan, Geomorphology,65, 15-31.
Baboli Mukher, H., Shirani, C. & Taghian, A. (2017). Evaluation of landslide sensitivity zoning map using a combination of reliability factor and logistic regression using geomorphometric indices. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 7 (3), 116 (In Persian).
Broeckx, J., Vanmarcke, M., Duchateau, R. & Poesen, J.) 2018(. A data-based landslide susceptibility map of Africa. Earth-Science Reviews, October 2018, 102-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.05.002.
Chang, J. M., Chen, H., Jou, B. J. D., Tsou, N. C. & Lin, G. W. (2017). Characteristics of rainfall intensity, duration, and kinetic energy for landslide triggering in Taiwan. Engineering Geology, 231, 81-87.‏
Chen, W., Xie, X., Peng, J., Wang, J., Duan, Z. & Hong, H. (2017). GIS-based landslide susceptibility modelling: a comparative assessment of kernel logistic regression, Naïve-Bayes tree, and alternating decision tree models. Geomatics. Natural Hazards and Risk, 1-24.‏
Colkesen, I., Sahin, E. & Kavzoglu, T. (2016). Susceptibility mapping of shallow landslides using kernel-based Gaussian process, support vector machines and logistic regression. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 118, 53-64.
Dai, F. C. & Lee, C. F. (2012). Land slide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau, Hong kong Geomorphology, 42, 213-228.
Das, I., Sahoo, S., Van Westen, C., Stein, A. & Hack, R. (2010). Landslide susceptibility assessment using logistic regression and its comparison with a rock mass classification system, along a road section in the northern Himalayas (India). Geomorphology, 114 (4), 627-637.
Dou, J., Yamagishi, H., Pourghasemi, H. R., Yunus, A. P., Song, X., Xu, Y. & Zhu, Z. (2015). An integrated artificial neural network model for the landslide susceptibility assessment of Osado Island, Japan. Natural Hazards, 78 (3), 1749-1776.
Foerster, S., Wilczok, C., Brosinsky, A. & Segl, K. (2017). Assessment of sediment con-nectivity from vegetation cover and topography using remotely sensed data in a dryland catchment in the Spanish Pyrenees. Soils Sediments 14, 1982-2000.
Gigovic, L., Drobnjak, S. & Pamucar, D. (2019). The Application of the Hybrid GIS Spatial Multi- Criteria Decision Analysis Best–Worst Methodology for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping, International. Jornal of Geo-Information, 8 (2), 1-29.
Hanifinia, A., Nazarnejad, H., Najafi, S. & Kornejady, A. (2021). Prioritization of Effective Factors on Landslide Occurrence and Mapping of its Sensitivity in CherikAbad Watershed, Urmia Using Shannon Entropy Model. Watershed Management Reserch, 33 (4), 32-48.
Haque, U., Paula, F. D., Silva Graziella, Devoli., Pilz, J., Zhao, B., Khaloua, A., Wilopoi, W.,Andersen,P., Luk, P., Lee, J., Yamamoto, T., Keellings, D. & Wuo, J. H., (2019). The human cost of global warming: Deadly landslides and their triggers (1995-2014). Science of The Total Environment, 682, 673-684.
Le, L., Lin, Q. & Wang, Y. (2017). Landslide susceptibility mapping on a global scale using the method of logistic regression. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 17 (8), 1411.‏
Li, Z., Lianghao, H., Linyu, F., Jinsong, H., Faming, H., Jiawu, C., Zihe, Z. & Yuhao, W. (2020). Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Modeling Based on Remote Sensing and a Novel Deep Learning Algorithm of a Cascade-Parallel Recurrent Neural Network. Sensors (Basel), 20 (6), 1576.
Moazez, S., Rustaei, Sh. & Rahimpour, T. (2019). Landslide risk zoning in Nahand Chay catchment using ANP model and GIS technique. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 8 (2), 23-37 (In Persian).
Mohammadnia, M. & Fallah Qalehri, Gh. A. (2017). Simulation of landslide probability using fuzzy logic and hierarchical analysis process. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 18 (48), 130-115 (In Persian).
Naseri, A., Hejazi, A. & Rezaei Moghadam, M. H. (2020). Landslide risk zoning using artificial neural network model downstream of Sanandaj Dam. Quarterly Journal of Environmental Erosion Research, 10 (1), 19-19 (In Persian).
Nojavan, M. R. Shah Zaidi, S., Davoodi, M. & Amin al-Ruayaei, H. (2019). Landslide zoning using two models of hierarchical and fuzzy analysis process (Case study: Kameh watershed, Isfahan province). Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 7 (4), 159-142 (In Persian).
Pham, B. T., Jaafari, A., Prakash, I. & Bui, D. T. (2019). A novel hybrid intelligent model of support vector machines and the MultiBoost ensemble for landslide susceptibility modeling. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78 (4), 2865-2886.
Polykretis, C. & Chalkias, C. (2018). Comparison and evaluation of landslide susceptibility maps obtained from weight of evidence, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Natural hazards, 93 (1), 249-274.
Rajabi, M., Tak Zare, A. & Rezaei Moghadam, M. H. (2020). Landslide risk potential zoning using the studied neural network model: Qazvin Province catchment area. Quantitative Geomorphology Quarterly, 9 (3), 185-171 (In Persian).
Rossi, M., Guzzetti, F., Salvati, P., Donnini, M., Napolitano, E. & Bianchi, C. (2019). A predictive model of societal landslide risk in Italy, Earth-Science Reviews, 196, 1-19.
Rustaei, Sh., Hejazi, A., Rajabi, M., Jalali, N., Najafi Igdir, A. (2019). Application of fuzzy logic in landslide risk zoning in Nazlouchai watershed. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 6 (4), 103-119 (In Persian).
Sharma, S. & Mahajan, A. K. (2019). A comparative assessment of information value, frequency ratio and analytical hierarchy process models for landslide susceptibility mapping of a Himalayan watershed, India. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78 (4), 2431-2448.
Shirzadi, A., Soleimani, K., Habibnejad, M., Kavian, A. & Chapi, K. (2017). A Novel Ensemble Algorithm Based Model for Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Around the Bijar Cityl. Geography and Development Iranian Journal, 15 (46), 225-246.
Vojtekova, J. & Vojtek, M. (2020). Assessment of landslide susceptibility at a localspatial scale applying the multi-criteria analysisand GIS: a case study from Slovaki, Geomatics. Natural Hazards and Risk, 11 (1), 131-148.