The Assessment and Analysis of the Hydromorphological Condition of Haji- Arab River, Bouein Zahra County

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Rivers have a lot of complexity and diversity in different environmental conditions, and various natural and human factors affect rivers and change their hydromorphological conditions. In fact, hydromorphological degradation is one of the most important types and causes of river changes which happens due to human interventions and consequently the adjustment of the river channel. Several methods have been developed to study the hydrogeomorphology of rivers. One of these methods is the morphological quality index, which has been proposed as a new protocol to assess the morphological quality of river flow. The present study aims to classify hydromorphological quality of the Haji-Arab River (which is located in the west of Bouin-Zahra city) by Morphological Quality Index (MQI). In this study, two main phases and three sub-phases are used for each phase and applied to eight spans. Various indicators such as: functionality index, artificiality index and adjustment index have been applied on this river. The results show that the amount of MQI in the studied intervals was between 0.82 to 0.74%. Among these, the maximum value was in the spans of 1,2,3,6 with a score of 0.82, while the minimum value was in the span of 8 with a score of 0.74.  In terms of quality, Haji-Arab River is on a good class and has good conditions. The functionality index in this river was zero, which was the result of non-intervention of human in the river. Therefore, it is suggested to protect Haji-Arab River appropriately by proper management.
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
Several tools have been developed in Europe and worldwide to assess hydromorphology and the methods for physical habitat assessment are the most common approach. These methods generally consist of surveying, characterisation and classification of physical habitat elements, mainly focusing on in-stream features. River management often focuses on individual span of river networks. However, the character and dynamism of river spans depends not only upon natural processes and human interventions within the span, but also within the catchment, particularly upstream of the span.
The Italian Environment Minister has recently issued the WFD monitoring and classification standards, introducing the Morphological Quality Index (MQI), which is part of IDRAIM, as a new and innovative protocol for stream morphological quality assessment. This study aims to apply Morphological Quality Index (MQI) for the hydromorphological analysis of Haji-Arab River.
2-Materials and Methods
Haji-Arab River is one of the southern rivers of Qazvin plain. The river flows generally from south to north. The total area of Haji-Arab Catchment is 130,657 square kilometers and the length of the study span is 7.45 kilometers. Regarding geological divisions of Iran, this region is part of the Urmia-Bazman magmatic belt of Central Iran. The climate of this area is temperate to warm and dry. The average annual flow rate was 0.62 m3/s and the maximum flow was 152 m3/s.
MQI has two phases and the components of the evaluation method. The first phase of the method is dividing the four steps. In step 1, a basic investigation of geology, geomorphology, climate, and the land use of the whole catchment is carried out. In step 2, lateral confinement is analyzed in more details, and three valley settings are differentiated: confined, partly confined, and laterally unconfined channels. In step 3, stream channels are classified into seven river morphologies (straight, sinuous, meandering, sinuous with alternate bars, wandering, braided, anastomosed). Step 4 considers additional discontinuities to further subdivide the stream spans, including hydrological discontinuities, bed slope, or relevant changes in channel width, alluvial plain width, or bed sediment. The second phase of the method is structure and key components of the evaluation procedure. The three aspects are considered for the assessment of the morphological quality of river spans. These aspects are analyzed in terms of three components: (i) the geomorphological functionality of river processes and forms; (ii) artificiality; and (iii) channel adjustments.
A total score was computed as the sum of scores across all components and aspects. The Morphological Alteration Index (MAI) is first defined as follows:
 MAI = Stot/Smax
In which Stot is the sum of the scores, and Smax is the maximum score that could be spaned when all appropriate indicators are in class C. The Morphological Quality Index is then defined as
MQI = 1−MAI
The following classes of morphological quality were defined: (i) high, 0.85≤MQI≤1; (ii) good, 0.7≤MQIb0.85; (iii) moderate, 0.5≤MQIb0.7; (iv) poor, 0.3≤MQIb0.5; (v) bad, 0≤MQIb0.3.
3-Results and Discussion
The Haji-Arab River was divided to eight spans based on investigating morphological quality. Regarding to physiographic units, spans 1, 2 and 3 are located in the low plain unit, and spans 4 to 8 are located in the intermontane plain unit. All spans are partly confined with hillslopes or ancient terraces and confinement degree is between 10 and 90 percentages. All of these spans as partly confined channels were classified based on their planimetric characteristics using sinuosity index and braiding index. Except for span 3 (multi-thread), other spans are single-thread channel.
There are no changes in the continuity of sediment and wood flux in all spans. There is no floodplain or negligible in the spans 1, 2, 4 and 5 but discontinued floodplain in the spans 3, 6, 7 and 8. The valley slope is connected to a considerable part of the river in the spans 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8, but connected to a small part of the river in the span 3 and connected to full part of the river in the spans 6 and 7. Except for span 7, all spans have no bank reiteration. All spans have potentially erodible corridors. Moreover, bed forms are compatible with the slope of the valley in the spans 3, 4, 5 and 8, while they are not compatible with the slope of the valley in the spans 1, 2, 6 and 7.  There are no heterogeneous changes of forms in all spans except for the span 3. There are no active flood plain forms in the all spans except for spans 3 and 5 with secondary channels. In all spans, there is no change of cross sections, no natural bed heterogeneity, and no large woods. Linear expansion of vegetation is less than 33%  in the all spans. They showed low width channel-related vegetation except for spans 6 and 7 with medium width channel-related vegetation.
There is no specific changes  channel-forming discharge and discharge, no structure, no changes in sediment discharge due to human interventions, no crossing structures, no protected banks along the river, no embankment,  no structures along the river, no sediment movement, no wood movement, no vegetation cut by humans in all of spans.
There is a change of channel pattern in the spans of 4, 5, 7 and 8 from braided to meandering pattern, drastic changes in channel width in the spans of 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, low changes of the base level in the spans of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6, medium changes of the base level in the spans of 5, 7 and 8.
4-Conclusion
The results show that the amount of MQI in Haji Arab River is between 0.82 to 0.74% and in terms of quality Haji-Arab river is in a good category and has good conditions. The artificiality indicators in this river are zero, which is the result of non-intervention of human in the River. Finally, it is recommended that protection of the Haji-Arab River and its corridors is essential. Other aspects of the hydromorphological conditions of the River, including physical habitat assessment, hydrological regime assessment, and the habitat of the river corridor should be considered in the future studies. It is better to study the impact of the dam under construction upstream on the hydromorphological conditions of the Haji-Arab River in the future.
 

Keywords


References
Aghanabati, A. (2014). The Geology of Iran. Tehran: Geological Survey of Iran (In Persian).
Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B. D. & Stribling J. B. (1999). Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. Second edition. EPA) 841(-B-99-002 U.S.
Belletti, B., Nardi, L., Rinaldi, M., Poppe, M., Brabec, K., Bussettini, M., Comiti, F., Gielczewski, M., Golfieri, B., Hellsten, S., Kail, J., Marchese, E., Marcinkowski, P., Okruszko, T., Paillex, A., Schirmer, M. Stelmaszczyk, M. & Surian, N. (2018). Assessing Restoration Effects on River Hydromorphology Using the Process-based Morphological Quality Index in Eight European River Reaches. Environmental Management, )61(, 69-84.
Bourne, C., Kehler D., Wiersma, Y. & Cote, D. (2011). Barriers to fish passage and barriers to fish passage assessments: the impact of assessment methods and assumptions on barrier identification and quantification of watershed connectivity. Aquatic Ecology, 45 (3), 389-403.
Brierley, G. J. & Fryirs, K. A. (2005). Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework. Blackwell, UK, Oxford.
Brierley, G. J. & Fryirs, K. A. (2008). River Futures: An Integrative Scientific Approach to River Repair. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Environmental Agency (EA). (2010). Mapping hydropower opportunities and sensitivities in England and Wales. Environment Agency Technical Report.
Golfieri, B., Surian, N. & Hardersen, S. (2018). Towards a more comprehensive assessment of river corridor conditions: A comparison between the Morphological Quality Index and three biotic indices. Ecological Indicators, (84), 525-534.
González Del Tánago, M. & García De Jalón, D. (2011). Riparian Quality Index (RQI): a methodology for characterizing and assessing environmental conditions of riparian zones. Limnetica, 30 (2), 235-254.
Ilanloo, M. & Karam, A. (2020). Evaluation of hydromorphological conditions of the river using MQI method (study area: Jajroud river). Applied research in geographical sciences, )56(, 53-35 (In Persian).
Ismaili, R. & Vali Khani, S. (2014). Investigation and analysis of hydromorphological conditions of Lavij river using morphological quality index. Journal of Quantitative Geomorphological Research, )4(, 53-37 (In Persian).
Large, A. R. G. & Newson, M. D. (2006). Natural rivers, ‘hydromorphological quality’ and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,) 31(, 1606-1624.
Lorenz, A. (2011). Ecohydromorphological assessment of streams and rivers in Germany. UDE. REFORM Kick off Meeting, November 2011, Florence. Unpublished presentation.
Martínez Santa-María, C., Fernández Yuste, J. A. )2010). IAHRIS 2.2. Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration in Rivers. User’s Manual. Ministry of the Environment - Polytechnic University of Madrid – CEDEX.
MATTM. (2010). Italian Ministry of Environment and Land and Sea Protection. Ministerial Decree 260/2010. ‘Regolamento recante i Criteri tecnici per la classificazione dello stato dei corpi idrici superficiali, per la modifica delle norme tecniche del decreto legislativo 3 aprile 2006, n. 152, recante norme in materia ambientale, predisposto ai sensi dell'articolo75, comma 3, del medesimo decreto legislativo’. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana 30 7th February 2011. (In Italian).
Nosrati, K., Rostami, M. & Etminan, Z. (2020). Assessment of Taleghan River Hydrogeomorphological Conditions Using Morphological Quality Index. Hydrogoemorphology, (21(, 133-154 (In Persian).
Rinaldi, M. & Surian, N. (2003). Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy. Geomorphology, 50 (4), 307-326.
Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Comiti, F. & Bussettini, M. (2012). Guidebook for the Evaluation of Stream Morphological Conditions by the Morphological Quality Index (MQI). Geomorphology, 180-181, 96-108.
Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Comiti, F. & Bussettini,M. (2013). A Method for the assessment and analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: the morphological quality index (MQI). Geomorphology, (180), 96-108.
Rosgen, D. L. (1996). Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO, 390 p. In: Rosgen D. (2006). The Natural Channel Design Method for River Restoration (+ 1996_StreamNotesReview). Wildland Hydrology.
Rosgen, D. L. (2006). A Watershed Assessment for River Stability and Sediment Supply (WARSSS). Wildland Hydrology Books, Fort Collins, CO.
Schumm, S. A., Harvey, M. D. & Watson, C. C. (1984). Incised Channels: Morphology, Dynamics and Control. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado, pp. 200. In: Darby S.E. and Simon A. (eds.) (1999): Incised River Channels: processe, forms, engineering and management. John Wiley & Sons,) 2(, 19-33.
The Nature Conservancy (2009). Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration. Version 7.1. User's Manual.
Yaghoob Nejad ASL, N., Esfandiary Darabad, F., Asghari Saraskanroud, S. & Karam, A. (2020). Morphological Quality Evaluation of Taleghan River. Watershed Engineering and Management, 9 (1), 657-669 (In Persian).